FEDERAL · 41 U.S.C. · Chapter 87
Definitions
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
In this chapter:
(1)Contracting agency.—The term "contracting agency", when used with respect to a prime contractor, means a department, agency, or establishment of the Federal Government that enters into a prime contract with a prime contractor.
(2)Kickback.—The term "kickback" means any money, fee, commission, credit, gift, gratuity, thing of value, or compensation of any kind that is provided to a prime contractor, prime contractor employee, subcontractor, or subcontractor employee to improperly obtain or reward favorable treatment in connection with a prime contract or a subcontract relating to a prime contract.
(3)Person.—The term "person" means a corporation, partnership, business association of any kind, trust, joint-stock company, or individual.
(4)Prime contract.—The term "pri
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
41 U.S.C. § 8701 (Definitions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States
728 F.3d 1348 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
Enhanced Veterans Solutions, Inc. v. United States
131 Fed. Cl. 565 (Federal Claims, 2017)
United States v. McDonough
727 F.3d 143 (First Circuit, 2013)
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States
99 Fed. Cl. 488 (Federal Claims, 2011)
United States Ex Rel. Vavra v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.
848 F.3d 366 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
John Doe v. Nestle, S.A.
929 F.3d 623 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. DeMizio
741 F.3d 373 (Second Circuit, 2014)
United States of America,ex rel Bud Conyers v. Halliburton Company
(S.D. Texas, 2021)
United States v. Vasquez
(Fifth Circuit, 2023)
United States v. Mission Support Alliance LLC
(E.D. Washington, 2020)
United States v. Management Consulting, Inc.
(E.D. Virginia, 2022)
United States of America v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2023)
Haight v. RRSA (Commercial) LLC
(N.D. Texas, 2020)
Free v. Kramer
(D. Colorado, 2023)
Maxwell v. Advanced Sterilization Products Inc.
(D. Colorado, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3838.)
Editorial Notes
In this section, the text of 41:52(3) is omitted because of the definition of "person" in 1:1.
In paragraph (2), the words "directly or indirectly" are omitted as unnecessary.
Senate Revision Amendment
Senate amendment 4726 (111th Cong.) added par. (3) and redesignated former pars. (3) to (8) as (4) to (9), respectively. See 156 Cong. Rec. 18683 (2010).
In paragraph (2), the words "directly or indirectly" are omitted as unnecessary.
Senate Revision Amendment
Senate amendment 4726 (111th Cong.) added par. (3) and redesignated former pars. (3) to (8) as (4) to (9), respectively. See 156 Cong. Rec. 18683 (2010).