FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 13
Assignment of retired Justices or judges to active duty
28 U.S.C. § 294
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter13 — ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGES TO OTHER COURTS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 294 (Assignment of retired Justices or judges to active duty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 294.
Text
(a)Any retired Chief Justice of the United States or Associate Justice of the Supreme Court may be designated and assigned by the Chief Justice of the United States to perform such judicial duties in any circuit, including those of a circuit justice, as he is willing to undertake.
(b)Any judge of the United States who has retired from regular active service under section 371(b) or 372(a) of this title shall be known and designated as a senior judge and may continue to perform such judicial duties as he is willing and able to undertake, when designated and assigned as provided in subsections (c) and (d).
(c)Any retired circuit or district judge may be designated and assigned by the chief judge or judicial council of his circuit to perform such judicial duties within the circuit as he is
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd.
647 F.2d 200 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)
H. Keith Zahn v. International Paper Company
469 F.2d 1033 (Second Circuit, 1972)
Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, Norman Scott v. Smithsonian Institution
566 F.2d 289 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
United States v. American-Foreign Steamship Corp.
363 U.S. 685 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc.
883 F.3d 100 (Second Circuit, 2018)
Application of Rudolf Wiechert
370 F.2d 927 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1967)
United States v. Robert L. Pinkney
551 F.2d 1241 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)
Soule Ex Rel. Stanescu v. Connecticut Association of Schools, Inc.
90 F.4th 34 (Second Circuit, 2023)
Moody v. Albemarle Paper Co.
417 U.S. 622 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Anne E. Miles v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation, and John A. Taylor
510 F.2d 188 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5380, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8755 Chief Probation Officers of California, and the County of Santa Barbara, California v. Donna Shalala, Mary Jo Bane, and Lavinia Limon, in Their Official Capacities, Department of Health and Human Services and Administration for Children and Families
118 F.3d 1327 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
National Coal Association v. Donald P. Hodel, U.S. Secretary of the Interior
825 F.2d 523 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Law
570 F.3d 574 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Walter L. Nixon, Jr.
827 F.2d 1019 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Dale J. Scott
529 F.2d 338 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
A. v. Bamford v. Federal Communications Commission
535 F.2d 78 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)
Max L. Krueger v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior
539 F.2d 235 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Frank Peter Teresi
484 F.2d 894 (Seventh Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Eugene P. Patterson
652 F.2d 1046 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 901; July 9, 1956, ch. 517, §1(c), 70 Stat. 497; Pub. L. 85–219, Aug. 29, 1957, 71 Stat. 495; Pub. L. 85–755, §5, Aug. 25, 1958, 72 Stat. 849; Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §206, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2660.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§375, 375a, and 375f (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §260, 36 Stat. 1161; Feb. 25, 1919, ch. 29, §6, 40 Stat. 1157; Mar. 1, 1929, ch. 419, 45 Stat. 1422; Mar. 1, 1937, ch. 21, 50 Stat. 24; Feb. 11, 1938, ch. 25, 52 Stat. 28; Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 433, §5, as added May 11, 1944, ch. 192, §§1–3, 58 Stat. 218, 219).
Section consolidates those parts of sections 375, 375a, and 375f of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to designation and assignment of retired justices and judges. Other provisions of said sections 375 and 375a, appear in sections 136, 371, and 756 of this title.
The term "chief judge" was substituted for "presiding judge or senior judge." (See Reviser's Note under section 136 of this title.)
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1978—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 95–598 directed the amendment of subsec. (c) by substituting "district or bankruptcy judge" for "or district" and the amendment of subsec. (d) by substituting ", district judge or bankruptcy judge" for "or district judge", which amendments did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.
1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–755 reenacted subsec. (a) without change.
Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 85–755 revised and rearranged subject matter to apply "senior judge" to all judges who retire from regular active service under sections 371(b) and 372(a) of this title, while retaining their commissions, rather than merely to those who ask to be placed on the Chief Justice's roster, to lodge solely in the chief judge and judicial council of the circuit concerned the intracircuit assignment power, and in the Chief Justice the power to assign retired judges beyond their circuits or special courts.
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 85–755 reenacted subsec. (e) without change.
1957—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 85–219 added subsec. (d).
1956—Subsec. (b). Act July 9, 1956, inserted provisions relating to assignment of retired judges of the Court of Claims.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Jurisdiction of United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Amendment by Pub. L. 85–755 not limiting or altering the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals [now United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit], see section 7 of Pub. L. 85–755, set out as a note under section 291 of this title.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§375, 375a, and 375f (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §260, 36 Stat. 1161; Feb. 25, 1919, ch. 29, §6, 40 Stat. 1157; Mar. 1, 1929, ch. 419, 45 Stat. 1422; Mar. 1, 1937, ch. 21, 50 Stat. 24; Feb. 11, 1938, ch. 25, 52 Stat. 28; Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 433, §5, as added May 11, 1944, ch. 192, §§1–3, 58 Stat. 218, 219).
Section consolidates those parts of sections 375, 375a, and 375f of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to designation and assignment of retired justices and judges. Other provisions of said sections 375 and 375a, appear in sections 136, 371, and 756 of this title.
The term "chief judge" was substituted for "presiding judge or senior judge." (See Reviser's Note under section 136 of this title.)
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1978—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 95–598 directed the amendment of subsec. (c) by substituting "district or bankruptcy judge" for "or district" and the amendment of subsec. (d) by substituting ", district judge or bankruptcy judge" for "or district judge", which amendments did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.
1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–755 reenacted subsec. (a) without change.
Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 85–755 revised and rearranged subject matter to apply "senior judge" to all judges who retire from regular active service under sections 371(b) and 372(a) of this title, while retaining their commissions, rather than merely to those who ask to be placed on the Chief Justice's roster, to lodge solely in the chief judge and judicial council of the circuit concerned the intracircuit assignment power, and in the Chief Justice the power to assign retired judges beyond their circuits or special courts.
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 85–755 reenacted subsec. (e) without change.
1957—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 85–219 added subsec. (d).
1956—Subsec. (b). Act July 9, 1956, inserted provisions relating to assignment of retired judges of the Court of Claims.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Jurisdiction of United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Amendment by Pub. L. 85–755 not limiting or altering the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals [now United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit], see section 7 of Pub. L. 85–755, set out as a note under section 291 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/294.