FEDERAL · 16 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—REGULATION OF ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANIES ENGAGED IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE
Rates and charges; schedules; suspension of new rates; automatic adjustment clauses
16 U.S.C. § 824d
Title16 — Conservation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—REGULATION OF ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANIES ENGAGED IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE
This text of 16 U.S.C. § 824d (Rates and charges; schedules; suspension of new rates; automatic adjustment clauses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
16 U.S.C. § 824d.
Text
(a)Just and reasonable rates
All rates and charges made, demanded, or received by any public utility for or in connection with the transmission or sale of electric energy subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission, and all rules and regulations affecting or pertaining to such rates or charges shall be just and reasonable, and any such rate or charge that is not just and reasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful.
(b)Preference or advantage unlawful
No public utility shall, with respect to any transmission or sale subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission, (1) make or grant any undue preference or advantage to any person or subject any person to any undue prejudice or disadvantage, or (2) maintain any unreasonable difference in rates, charges, service, facilities, or in any other
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
535 U.S. 467 (Supreme Court, 2002)
New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
535 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
684 F.2d 20 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Public Service Commission
380 A.2d 126 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1978)
Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
671 F.2d 587 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Metropolitan Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Borough of Middletown, Pennsylvania, Intervenor
595 F.2d 851 (D.C. Circuit, 1979)
Public Service Company of New Mexico v. Federal Power Commission, City of Gallup, New Mexico, Intervenor. City of Gallup, New Mexico v. Federal Power Commission, Public Service Company of New Mexico, Intervenor
557 F.2d 227 (Tenth Circuit, 1977)
Town of Boylston v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
21 F.3d 1130 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
827 F.3d 75 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
Cities of Carlisle & Neola v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
704 F.2d 1259 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC
45 F.4th 248 (D.C. Circuit, 2022)
Cities of Batavia v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
672 F.2d 64 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Second Taxing District v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
683 F.2d 477 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
824 F.2d 981 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
28 F.3d 173 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
Middle South Energy, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
747 F.2d 763 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Mid-Tex Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
822 F.2d 1123 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Alabama Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
993 F.2d 1557 (D.C. Circuit, 1993)
Source Credit
History
(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. II, §205, as added Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §213, 49 Stat. 851; amended Pub. L. 95–617, title II, §§207(a), 208, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3142; Pub. L. 115–270, title III, §3006, Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3868.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2018—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 115–270 added subsec. (g).
1978—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95–617, §207(a), substituted "sixty" for "thirty" in two places.
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 95–617, §208, added subsec. (f).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Study of Electric Rate Increases Under Federal Power Act
Section 207(b) of Pub. L. 95–617 directed chairman of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in consultation with Secretary, to conduct a study of legal requirements and administrative procedures involved in consideration and resolution of proposed wholesale electric rate increases under Federal Power Act, section 791a et seq. of this title, for purposes of providing for expeditious handling of hearings consistent with due process, preventing imposition of successive rate increases before they have been determined by Commission to be just and reasonable and otherwise lawful, and improving procedures designed to prohibit anticompetitive or unreasonable differences in wholesale and retail rates, or both, and that chairman report to Congress within nine months from Nov. 9, 1978, on results of study, on administrative actions taken as a result of this study, and on any recommendations for changes in existing law that will aid purposes of this section.
Amendments
2018—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 115–270 added subsec. (g).
1978—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95–617, §207(a), substituted "sixty" for "thirty" in two places.
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 95–617, §208, added subsec. (f).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Study of Electric Rate Increases Under Federal Power Act
Section 207(b) of Pub. L. 95–617 directed chairman of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in consultation with Secretary, to conduct a study of legal requirements and administrative procedures involved in consideration and resolution of proposed wholesale electric rate increases under Federal Power Act, section 791a et seq. of this title, for purposes of providing for expeditious handling of hearings consistent with due process, preventing imposition of successive rate increases before they have been determined by Commission to be just and reasonable and otherwise lawful, and improving procedures designed to prohibit anticompetitive or unreasonable differences in wholesale and retail rates, or both, and that chairman report to Congress within nine months from Nov. 9, 1978, on results of study, on administrative actions taken as a result of this study, and on any recommendations for changes in existing law that will aid purposes of this section.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 U.S.C. § 824d, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/16/824d.