FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE

Art. 44. Former jeopardy

10 U.S.C. § 844
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 844 (Art. 44. Former jeopardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 844.

Text

(a)No person may, without his consent, be tried a second time for the same offense.
(b)No proceeding in which an accused has been found guilty by a court-martial upon any charge or specification is a trial in the sense of this article until the finding of guilty has become final after review of the case has been fully completed.
(c)(1) A court-martial with a military judge alone is a trial in the sense of this section (article) if, without fault of the accused—
(A)after introduction of evidence; and
(B)before announcement of findings under section 853 of this title (article 53); the case is dismissed or terminated by the convening authority or the special trial counsel or on motion of the prosecution for failure of available evidence or witnesses.
(2)A court-martial with a military ju

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Quiroz
55 M.J. 334 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2001)
366 case citations
State v. Morley
952 P.2d 167 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
165 case citations
United States v. Pierce
27 M.J. 367 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1989)
138 case citations
United States v. Mizgala
61 M.J. 122 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2005)
129 case citations
United States v. Frederick
3 M.J. 230 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1977)
79 case citations
United States v. Speller
8 C.M.A. 363 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
50 case citations
United States v. Manuel
43 M.J. 282 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1995)
34 case citations
United States v. Rosendahl
53 M.J. 344 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2000)
34 case citations
United States v. Troglin
21 C.M.A. 183 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)
32 case citations
United States v. Thompson
68 M.J. 308 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2010)
32 case citations
United States v. Easton
71 M.J. 168 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
32 case citations
United States v. Fretwell
11 C.M.A. 377 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1960)
27 case citations
United States v. Kirsch
15 C.M.A. 84 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1964)
27 case citations
United States v. Waldron
15 C.M.A. 628 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1966)
25 case citations
United States v. Hutchison
57 M.J. 231 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2002)
22 case citations
United States v. Delarosa
67 M.J. 318 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2009)
22 case citations
United States v. Ivory
9 C.M.A. 516 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
21 case citations
United States v. Wells
9 C.M.A. 509 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
19 case citations
Gorko v. Commanding Officer, Second Air Force, Shreveport, Louisiana
314 F.2d 858 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)
17 case citations
Wendy L. Wickham v. Alvin O. Hall, Colonel, U.S. Army, and United States
706 F.2d 713 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
14 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 52; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LVII, §5226, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2910; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, §538, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1698.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a), the word "may" is substituted for the word "shall".
In subsection (b), the word "is" is substituted for the words "shall be held to be".
In subsection (c), the word "after" is substituted for the words "subsequent to". The word "before" is substituted for the words "prior to". The word "is" is substituted for the words "shall be".

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2021—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–81 inserted "or the special trial counsel" after "the convening authority" in two places.
2016—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328 amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) read as follows: "A proceeding which, after the introduction of evidence but before a finding, is dismissed or terminated by the convening authority or on motion of the prosecution for failure of available evidence or witnesses without any fault of the accused is a trial in the sense of this article."

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2021 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 117–81 effective on the date that is two years after Dec. 27, 2021, and applicable with respect to offenses that occur after that date, with provisions for delayed effect and applicability if regulations are not prescribed by the President before the date that is two years after Dec. 27, 2021, see section 539C of Pub. L. 117–81, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/844.