FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE

Art. 42. Oaths

10 U.S.C. § 842
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 842 (Art. 42. Oaths) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 842.

Text

(a)Before performing their respective duties, military judges, members of general and special courts-martial, trial counsel, assistant trial counsel, defense counsel, assistant or associate defense counsel, reporters, and interpreters shall take an oath to perform their duties faithfully. The form of the oath, the time and place of the taking thereof, the manner of recording the same, and whether the oath shall be taken for all cases in which these duties are to be performed or for a particular case, shall be as prescribed in regulations of the Secretary concerned. These regulations may provide that an oath to perform faithfully duties as a military judge, trial counsel, assistant trial counsel, defense counsel, or assistant or associate defense counsel may be taken at any time by any jud

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Quiroz
55 M.J. 334 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2001)
366 case citations
United States v. Weiss
36 M.J. 224 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1992)
120 case citations
United States v. Mitchell
39 M.J. 131 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1994)
74 case citations
United States v. Hurt
9 C.M.A. 735 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
72 case citations
United States v. Albright
9 C.M.A. 628 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
62 case citations
United States v. Warren
13 M.J. 278 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
51 case citations
United States v. Easton
71 M.J. 168 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
32 case citations
United States v. Roach
66 M.J. 410 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2008)
24 case citations
United States v. Miller
19 M.J. 159 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1985)
19 case citations
Metz v. United States
61 Fed. Cl. 154 (Federal Claims, 2004)
10 case citations
United States v. Parham
14 C.M.A. 161 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1963)
9 case citations
United States v. Steele
53 M.J. 274 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2000)
7 case citations
Durant v. Hironimus
73 F. Supp. 79 (S.D. West Virginia, 1947)
4 case citations
United States v. Elliott
15 M.J. 347 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1983)
3 case citations
Bozin v. Secretary of the Navy
657 F. Supp. 1463 (District of Columbia, 1987)
3 case citations
United States v. McGee
15 M.J. 1004 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1983)
2 case citations
United States v. Lane
60 M.J. 781 (Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2004)
2 case citations
United States v. Honeycutt
27 M.J. 863 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1989)
1 case citations
United States v. Risk
1 M.J. 642 (U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review, 1975)
1 case citations
United States v. Walsh
22 C.M.A. 509 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1973)

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 51; Pub. L. 90–632, §2(18), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1339; Pub. L. 98–209, §§2(e), 3(f), Dec. 6, 1983, 97 Stat. 1393, 1395.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a), the word "all" and the word "the" before the words "members", "trial", "defense", and "reporter" are omitted as surplusage.
In subsections (a) and (b), the words "or affirmation" are omitted as covered by the definition of the word "oath" in section 1 of Title 1.
In subsection (b), the words "Each witness" are substituted for the words "All witnesses".

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–209 struck out ", law specialist," after "judge advocate" in two places, substituted "assistant or associate defense counsel" for "assistant defense counsel".
1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–632 struck out requirement that the oath given to court-martial personnel be taken in the presence of the accused and provided that the form of the oath, the time and place of its taking, the manner of recording thereof, and whether the oath shall be taken for all cases or for a particular case shall be as prescribed by regulations of the Secretary concerned and contemplated secretarial regulations allowing the administration of an oath to certified legal personnel on a one-time basis.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1983 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–209 effective first day of eighth calendar month beginning after Dec. 6, 1983, see section 12(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–209, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/842.