South Dakota Statutes
§ 20-11-5 — Privileged communications--Malice not inferred from publication.
South Dakota § 20-11-5
This text of South Dakota § 20-11-5 (Privileged communications--Malice not inferred from publication.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
S.D. Codified Laws § 20-11-5 (2026).
Text
A privileged communication is one made:
(1)In the proper discharge of an official duty;
(2)In any legislative or judicial proceeding, or in any other official proceeding authorized by law;
(3)In a communication, without malice, to a person interested therein, by one who is also interested, or by one who stands in such relation to the person interested as to afford a reasonable ground for supposing the motive for the communication innocent, or who is requested by the person interested to give the information;
(4)By a fair and true report, without malice, of a judicial, legislative, or other public official proceeding or of anything said in the course thereof. In the cases provided for in subdivisions (3) and (4) of this section, malice is not inferred from the communication
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bego v. Gordon
407 N.W.2d 801 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
Blote v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City
422 N.W.2d 834 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1988)
Janklow v. Viking Press
378 N.W.2d 875 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)
MacKintosh v. Carter
451 N.W.2d 285 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1990)
Jacobson v. Leisinger
2008 SD 19 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2008)
Janklow v. Keller
241 N.W.2d 364 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1976)
Kieser v. Southeast Properties
1997 SD 87 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Gregory's, Inc. v. Haan
1996 SD 35 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
Flugge v. Wagner
532 N.W.2d 419 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1995)
Gateway, Inc. v. Companion Products, Inc.
320 F. Supp. 2d 912 (D. South Dakota, 2002)
Hernandez v. Avera Queen of Peace Hospital
2016 SD 68 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2016)
Fendrich v. Lauck
307 N.W.2d 607 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1981)
Gantvoort v. Ranschau
2022 S.D. 22 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2022)
Condron v. Avera McKennan
(D. South Dakota, 2023)
Harvey v. Regional Health Network
2018 SD 3 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2018)
Jed Spectrum, Inc. v. Stoakes
2025 S.D. 31 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2025)
Ngam v. Kludt
(D. South Dakota, 2025)
Legislative History
CivC 1877, § 31; CL 1887, § 2530; RCivC 1903, § 31; RC 1919, § 99; SDC 1939, § 47.0503.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 20-1-1
Obligation defined.§ 20-1-2
Origin of obligations.§ 20-10-2
Acts constituting deceit.§ 20-10A-1
Definition of terms.§ 20-10A-2
Cause of action for damages.§ 20-10A-3
Liability for damages.§ 20-10A-4
Limitation on actions for damages.§ 20-11-2
Classes of defamation.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
South Dakota § 20-11-5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sd/20-11-5.