Nebraska Statutes
§ 42-358 — Attorney for minor child; appointment; powers; child or spousal support; records; income withholding; contempt proceedings; fees; evidence; appeal
Nebraska § 42-358
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 42Households and Families
This text of Nebraska § 42-358 (Attorney for minor child; appointment; powers; child or spousal support; records; income withholding; contempt proceedings; fees; evidence; appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-358 (2026).
Text
(1)The court may appoint an attorney to protect the interests of any minor children of the parties. Such attorney shall be empowered to make independent investigations and to cause witnesses to appear and testify on matters pertinent to the welfare of the children. The court shall by order fix the fee, including disbursements, for such attorney, which amount shall be taxed as costs and paid by the parties as ordered. If the court finds that the party responsible is indigent, the court may order the county to pay the costs.
(2)Following entry of any decree, the court having jurisdiction over the minor children of the parties may at any time appoint an attorney, as friend of the court, to initiate contempt proceedings for failure of any party to comply with an order of the court directing
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State on Behalf of Hopkins v. Batt
573 N.W.2d 425 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
Deacon v. Deacon
297 N.W.2d 757 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1980)
Betz v. Betz
575 N.W.2d 406 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
Mathews v. Mathews
676 N.W.2d 42 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2004)
Ritter v. Ritter
450 N.W.2d 204 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
JOYCE S. v. Frank S.
571 N.W.2d 801 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)
Mitchell v. French
676 N.W.2d 361 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2004)
Drennen v. Drennen
426 N.W.2d 252 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
McCaul v. McCaul
771 N.W.2d 222 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2009)
Eliker v. Eliker
295 N.W.2d 268 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1980)
In Re Guardianship of Suezanne P.
578 N.W.2d 64 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1998)
Watkins v. Watkins
829 N.W.2d 643 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
Brackhan v. Brackhan
524 N.W.2d 74 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1994)
Chalupa v. Chalupa
371 N.W.2d 706 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
State on behalf of Maria B. & Renee B. v. Kyle B.
298 Neb. 759 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
In Re Interest of Rachael M.
603 N.W.2d 10 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1999)
Kropf v. Kropf
538 N.W.2d 496 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1995)
In re Estate of Hutton
306 Neb. 579 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
McKibbin v. State
560 N.W.2d 507 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)
Scully v. Scully
331 N.W.2d 801 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1972, LB 820, § 12; Laws 1974, LB 961, § 1; Laws 1975, LB 212, § 1; Laws 1976, LB 926, § 1; Laws 1978, LB 960, § 1; Laws 1985, Second Spec. Sess., LB 7, § 10; Laws 1991, LB 457, § 1; Laws 1991, LB 732, § 101; Laws 1992, LB 1184, § 11; Laws 1994, LB 1224, § 43; Laws 1996, LB 1044, § 99; Laws 1996, LB 1155, § 7; Laws 1997, LB 307, § 16; Laws 2000, LB 972, § 9; Laws 2002, LB 1062, § 2; Laws 2005, LB 396, § 1; Laws 2007, LB296, § 56.
Cross References: Income Withholding for Child Support Act, see section 43-1701.
Annotations: 1. Appointment of guardian ad litem 2. Evidence admissible 3. Miscellaneous 1. Appointment of guardian ad litem This section authorizes a court to appoint an attorney or guardian ad litem to protect the interests of minor children and allows the attorney or guardian ad litem to recover his or her fees. Mitchell v. French, 267 Neb. 656, 676 N.W.2d 361 (2004). An attorney appointed under this section is an advocate for the minor child and is not a guardian ad litem. An attorney appointed under this section shall act as attorney for the minor child, but shall not testify in the proceedings. From June 1, 1998, forward, when appointing a guardian ad litem or an attorney to represent the interests of the minor pursuant to this section in forums other than the juvenile court, the appointing court, in the order making the appointment, shall specify whether the person appointed is to act as a guardian ad litem or as an attorney pursuant to this section. One person may not serve in both capacities. Betz v. Betz, 254 Neb. 341, 575 N.W.2d 406 (1998). Under subsection (1) of this section, the appointment of a guardian ad litem in a marital dissolution proceeding is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court. Ritter v. Ritter, 234 Neb. 203, 450 N.W.2d 204 (1990). Appointment of a guardian ad litem is a discretionary matter. Generally, adequate representation by counsel for the respective parties, independent investigative power of the court, and continuing jurisdiction over minors protect the children's interests adequately. Chalupa v. Chalupa, 220 Neb. 704, 371 N.W.2d 706 (1985). The court has authority to appoint a guardian ad litem to protect the interest of a minor child. Nye v. Nye, 213 Neb. 364, 329 N.W.2d 346 (1983). When there is adequate representation of both parties to the dissolution, the trial court has made an independent investigation of the children's situation, and the court has continuing jurisdiction over the children, it is not error for the court to deny a request to appoint a guardian ad litem for the children. Deacon v. Deacon, 207 Neb. 193, 297 N.W.2d 757 (1980). When it appears that minor children in a divorce action may have interests, independent of the parents, in the outcome of the litigation, the district court should ordinarily appoint counsel to represent them. Ford v. Ford, 191 Neb. 548, 216 N.W.2d 176 (1974). District court may appoint attorney for minor children and limits on its discretion to do so must evolve case by case. Pieck v. Pieck, 190 Neb. 419, 209 N.W.2d 191 (1973). 2. Evidence admissible Issues of visitation and previous failure to enforce a child support order are not relevant to proceedings under section 42-358, R.R.S.1943, or section 42-364.01, R.R.S.1943. Eliker v. Eliker, 206 Neb. 764, 295 N.W.2d 268 (1980). In a divorce case, ex parte investigative reports are not evidence, and cannot be the basis for any adjudication. Jorgensen v. Jorgensen, 194 Neb. 271, 231 N.W.2d 360 (1975). 3. Miscellaneous Subsection (1) of this section permits the district court to order the county to pay attorney fees and expenses only when a responsible party is indigent. White v. White, 296 Neb. 772, 896 N.W.2d 600 (2017). When an indigence hearing takes place after the appointment of a guardian ad litem and the ordering of fees, a trial court's determination of indigence should depend upon a party's finances at the time of the indigence hearing. White v. White, 293 Neb. 439, 884 N.W.2d 1 (2016). This section allows for payment of guardian ad litem fees by a county only if a court finds that the party responsible is indigent. Mitchell v. French, 267 Neb. 656, 676 N.W.2d 361 (2004). This section is applicable to cases that begin as paternity actions in which the only controverted issues are custody and child support. Mitchell v. French, 267 Neb. 656, 676 N.W.2d 361 (2004). A finding of indigency is a matter within the initial discretion of the trial court, and such a finding will not be set aside on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion by the trial court. Mathews v. Mathews, 267 Neb. 604, 676 N.W.2d 42 (2004). Under subsection (1) of this section, a person is indigent if he or she is unable to pay the guardian ad litem or attorney fees without prejudicing, in a meaningful way, his or her financial ability to provide the necessities of life, such as food, clothing, shelter, medical care, et cetera, for himself or herself or his or her legal dependents. Mathews v. Mathews, 267 Neb. 604, 676 N.W.2d 42 (2004). A proceeding brought under this section is civil in nature. Eliker v. Eliker, 206 Neb. 764, 295 N.W.2d 268 (1980). Counsel, appointed for children, participated in trial and appeal, and his fee was taxed to appellant as costs. Hermance v. Hermance, 194 Neb. 720, 235 N.W.2d 231 (1975). Because subsection (1) of this section designates guardian ad litem fees as "costs," they must be determined by the time of the entry of a final, appealable order. McCaul v. McCaul, 17 Neb. App. 801, 771 N.W.2d 222 (2009). Under subsection (3) of this section, the clerk of the district court must certify that the court-ordered child support is delinquent in an amount equal to the support due and owing payable for a 1-month period of time and report this amount to the county attorney or authorized attorney. McKibbin v. State, 5 Neb. App. 570, 560 N.W.2d 507 (1997). The language of subsection (1) of this section requires that the fees and disbursements of an attorney appointed pursuant to subsection (1) "shall" be taxed as costs and paid by the parties as ordered. The county "may" be ordered to pay the amount so taxed as costs, but only upon a finding that the party responsible is indigent. Brackhan v. Brackhan, 3 Neb. App. 143, 524 N.W.2d 74 (1994).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 42-1001
Act, how cited§ 42-1002
Definitions§ 42-1003
Formalities§ 42-1004
Content§ 42-1005
Effect of marriage§ 42-1006
Enforcement§ 42-1007
Enforcement; void marriage§ 42-1008
Limitation of actions§ 42-1009
Application and construction§ 42-101
Marriage a civil contract§ 42-1010
Severability§ 42-1011
Time of taking effect§ 42-103
Marriages; when voidCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 42-358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/42-358.