Indiana Statutes
§ 26-1-2-105 — Transferability; "goods"; "future" goods; "lot"; "commercial unit"
Indiana § 26-1-2-105
This text of Indiana § 26-1-2-105 (Transferability; "goods"; "future" goods; "lot"; "commercial unit") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ind. Code § 26-1-2-105 (2026).
Text
(1)"Goods" means all things (including
specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of
identification to the contract for sale, other than the money in which the
price is to be paid, investment securities (IC 26-1-8.1), and things in
action. "Goods" also includes the unborn young of animals and growing
crops and other identified things attached to realty as described in the
section on goods to be severed from realty (IC 26-1-2-107).
(2)Goods must be both existing and identified before any interest
in them can pass. Goods which are not both existing and identified are
"future" goods. A purported present sale of future goods or of any
interest therein operates as a contract to sell.
(3)There may be a sale of a part interest in existing identified
goods.
(4)An undivided sha
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nucor Corporation v. Aceros Y Maquilas De Occidente, S.A. De C.V.
28 F.3d 572 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
Ogden Martin Systems of Indianapolis, Inc. v. Whiting Corp.
179 F.3d 523 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)
Conwell v. Gray Loon Outdoor Marketing Group, Inc.
906 N.E.2d 805 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2009)
Insul-Mark Midwest, Inc. v. Modern Materials, Inc.
612 N.E.2d 550 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1993)
Catellier v. Depco, Inc.
696 N.E.2d 75 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1998)
Peltz Construction Co. v. Dunham
436 N.E.2d 892 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1982)
Mynsberge v. Department of State Revenue
716 N.E.2d 629 (Indiana Tax Court, 1999)
Insul-Mark Midwest, Inc. v. Modern Materials, Inc.
594 N.E.2d 459 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1992)
Bailey v. Skipperliner Industries, Inc.
278 F. Supp. 2d 945 (N.D. Indiana, 2003)
Urschel Farms, Inc. v. Dekalb Swine Breeders, Inc.
858 F. Supp. 831 (N.D. Indiana, 1994)
Martin Rispens & Son v. Hall Farms, Inc.
601 N.E.2d 429 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1992)
A.A.A. Exteriors, Inc. v. Don Mahurin Chevrolet & Oldsmobile, Inc.
429 N.E.2d 975 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1981)
Todd Heller, Inc. v. Indiana Department of Transportation
819 N.E.2d 140 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
Thomas v. Hemmelgarn
579 N.E.2d 1333 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1991)
Stardust Ventures, LLC v. Gary Roberts and Teresa Roberts
65 N.E.3d 1122 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2016)
Maples Health Care, Inc. v. Firestone Building Products
(Indiana Court of Appeals, 2020)
Cox Wood Removal and Lawn Care LLC v. BIK Boom Trucks LLC
(N.D. Indiana, 2024)
Moshe Scaba v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
(N.D. Indiana, 2025)
Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. v. Dykhuis Farms, Inc.
(N.D. Indiana, 2022)
Vehicle Service Group, LLC v. Auto Equipment Co.
838 F. Supp. 2d 842 (S.D. Indiana, 2011)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 26-1-1-0.3
Certain security interests considered perfected§ 26-1-1-0.5
Status of certain security interests; conditions; lapsing of perfection;
filing of financing statements§ 26-1-1-101
Short title; application§ 26-1-1-104
Construction against implicit repeal§ 26-1-1-105
Repealed§ 26-1-1-106
Remedies to be liberally administered§ 26-1-1-108
SeverabilityCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Indiana § 26-1-2-105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/in/26-1-2-105.