Georgia Statutes
§ 51-1-11 — When privity required to support action; product liability action and time limitation therefore; industry-wide liability theories rejected
Georgia § 51-1-11
JurisdictionGeorgia
Title51
This text of Georgia § 51-1-11 (When privity required to support action; product liability action and time limitation therefore; industry-wide liability theories rejected) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O.C.G.A. § 51-1-11 (2026).
Text
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this Code section, no privity is necessary to support a tort action; but, if the tort results from the violation of a duty which is itself the consequence of a contract, the right of action is confined to the parties and those in privity to that contract, except in cases where the party would have a right of action for the injury done independently of the contract and except as provided in Code Section 11-2-318 .
(b)(1) The manufacturer of any personal property sold as new property directly or through a dealer or any other person shall be liable in tort, irrespective of privity, to any natural person who may use, consume, or reasonably be affected by the property and who suffers injury to his person or property because the property when sold by the manu
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
American Living Systems v. Bonapfel (In Re All American of Ashburn, Inc.)
56 B.R. 186 (N.D. Georgia, 1986)
Lewis v. Atlanta Casualty Co.
345 S.E.2d 858 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Stimson v. George Laycock, Inc.
542 S.E.2d 121 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Freeman v. United Cities Propane Gas of Georgia, Inc.
807 F. Supp. 1533 (M.D. Georgia, 1992)
Davis v. Brunswick Corp.
854 F. Supp. 1574 (N.D. Georgia, 1994)
Bryant v. BGHA, Inc.
9 F. Supp. 3d 1374 (M.D. Georgia, 2014)
Jones v. Amazing Products, Inc.
231 F. Supp. 2d 1228 (N.D. Georgia, 2002)
Cline v. Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.
17 F. Supp. 3d 1275 (N.D. Georgia, 2014)
Barnett v. Leiserv, Inc.
968 F. Supp. 690 (N.D. Georgia, 1997)
Jonas v. Isuzu Motors Ltd.
210 F. Supp. 2d 1373 (M.D. Georgia, 2002)
Philips Medical Systems North America Co. v. Diagnostic Equipment Services, Inc.
444 S.E.2d 345 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
In re Fuel Barons, Inc.
488 B.R. 783 (N.D. Georgia, 2013)
In re Webb
482 B.R. 669 (M.D. Georgia, 2012)
Hayward v. Doe
(S.D. Georgia, 2019)
Andrews v. Autoliv Japan, Ltd.
228 F. Supp. 3d 1340 (N.D. Georgia, 2017)
Anglin v. BI LO, LLC
(S.D. Georgia, 2022)
Barnes v. Medtronic, Inc.
(N.D. Georgia, 2021)
Chaitram v. ILG Technologies, LLC
(N.D. Georgia, 2020)
CHRISTIAN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
(M.D. Georgia, 2023)
Crews v. Primal Vantage Company, Inc.
(S.D. Georgia, 2020)
Legislative History
Amended by 2009 Ga. Laws 111,§ 1, eff. 5/4/2009.
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Georgia § 51-1-11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ga/51-1-11.