District of Columbia Statutes

§ 32-1001 — Findings and declaration of policy.

District of Columbia § 32-1001
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 32Labor.
Ch. 10Minimum Wages.
Subch. IGeneral.

This text of District of Columbia § 32-1001 (Findings and declaration of policy.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.C. Code § 32-1001 (2026).

Text

(a)The Council of the District of Columbia finds that persons employed in the District of Columbia should be paid at wages sufficient to provide adequate maintenance and to protect health. Any wage that is not sufficient to provide adequate maintenance and to protect health impairs the health, efficiency, and well-being of persons so employed, constitutes unfair competition against other employers and their employees, threatens the stability of industry, reduces the purchasing power of employees, and requires, in many instances, that their wages be supplemented by the payment of public moneys for relief or other public and private assistance. Employment of persons at these insufficient rates of pay threatens the health and well-being of the people of the District of Columbia and injures t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hicks v. Association of American Medical Colleges
503 F. Supp. 2d 48 (District of Columbia, 2007)
38 case citations
Driscoll v. George Washington University
42 F. Supp. 3d 52 (District of Columbia, 2012)
37 case citations
Guevara v. Ischia, Inc.
47 F. Supp. 3d 23 (District of Columbia, 2014)
24 case citations
Cortes Herrera v. Mitch O'Hara LLC
257 F. Supp. 3d 37 (District of Columbia, 2017)
17 case citations
Galloway v. Chugach Government Services, Inc.
199 F. Supp. 3d 145 (District of Columbia, 2016)
16 case citations
Akinsinde v. Not-For-Profit Hospital Corporation
216 F. Supp. 3d 33 (District of Columbia, 2016)
15 case citations
Hernandez v. Stringer
210 F. Supp. 3d 54 (District of Columbia, 2016)
11 case citations
Johnson v. Prospect Waterproofing Company
813 F. Supp. 2d 4 (District of Columbia, 2011)
11 case citations
FUDALI v. Pivotal Corp.
310 F. Supp. 2d 22 (District of Columbia, 2004)
8 case citations
Al-Quraan v. 4115 8th St. NW, LLC
113 F. Supp. 3d 367 (District of Columbia, 2015)
7 case citations
Amaya v. Logo Enterprises, LLC
251 F. Supp. 3d 196 (District of Columbia, 2017)
7 case citations
Arencibia v. 2401 Restaurant Corp.
699 F. Supp. 2d 318 (District of Columbia, 2010)
6 case citations
Blount v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.
930 F. Supp. 2d 191 (District of Columbia, 2013)
6 case citations
Encinas v. J.J. Drywall Corporation
840 F. Supp. 2d 6 (District of Columbia, 2012)
6 case citations
Long v. Endocrine Society
263 F. Supp. 3d 275 (District of Columbia, 2017)
5 case citations
Azamar v. Stern
275 F.R.D. 1 (District of Columbia, 2011)
4 case citations
Dinkel v. Medstar Health Inc.
304 F.R.D. 339 (District of Columbia, 2014)
4 case citations
Escobar Iraheta v. Magic Meals, Inc.
201 F. Supp. 3d 172 (District of Columbia, 2016)
4 case citations
Coffen v. Washington Convention & Sports Authority
271 F. Supp. 3d 211 (District of Columbia, 2017)
3 case citations
Castro v. Molecular Systems Inc.
963 F. Supp. 2d 3 (District of Columbia, 2013)
2 case citations

Legislative History

Mar. 25, 1993, D.C. Law 9-248, § 2, 40 DCR 761

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 32-1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/32-1001.