District of Columbia Statutes
§ 16-4423 — Vacating award.
District of Columbia § 16-4423
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 16Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. [Enacted title]
Ch. 44Arbitration; Revised Uniform Act.
This text of District of Columbia § 16-4423 (Vacating award.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 16-4423 (2026).
Text
(a)Upon motion to the court by a party to an arbitration proceeding, the court shall vacate an award made in the arbitration proceeding if:
(1)The award was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means;
(2)There was:
(A)Evident partiality by an arbitrator appointed as a neutral arbitrator;
(B)Corruption by an arbitrator; or
(C)Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding;
(3)An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement, refused to consider evidence material to the controversy, or otherwise conducted the hearing contrary to § 16-4415 , so as to prejudice substantially the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding;
(4)An arbitrator exceeded the arb
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Martin
67 A.3d 1032 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
Adkins Ltd. Partnership v. O Street Management, LLC
56 A.3d 1159 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
Oehme, Van Sweden & Associates, Inc. v. Maypaul Trading & Services Ltd.
902 F. Supp. 2d 87 (District of Columbia, 2012)
Arma, S.R.O. v. Bae Systems Overseas, Inc.
961 F. Supp. 2d 245 (District of Columbia, 2013)
A1 Team USA Holdings, LLC v. Bingham McCutchen LLP
998 A.2d 320 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
Contech Construction Products, Inc. v. Heierli
764 F. Supp. 2d 96 (District of Columbia, 2011)
Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC v. Daley, Debofsky and Bryant, P.C.
177 F. Supp. 3d 197 (District of Columbia, 2016)
BiotechPharma, LLC v. Ludwig & Robinson, PLLC
98 A.3d 986 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2014)
Affinity Financial Corp. v. Aarp Financial, Inc.
794 F. Supp. 2d 117 (District of Columbia, 2011)
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Hagenberg
167 A.3d 1218 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2017)
Washington Teachers' Union Local 6 v. District of Columbia Public Schools
77 A.3d 441 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
249 F. Supp. 3d 427 (District of Columbia, 2017)
PAMELA B. STUART v. BARBARA J. WALKER
143 A.3d 761 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
Affinity Financial Corporation v. Aarp Financial, Inc.
(District of Columbia, 2011)
BDO USA, LLP v. Jia-Sobota & A2Z Assoc., Inc. D/B/A Everglade Consulting
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
C.R. Calderon Construction, Inc. v. Grunley Construction Company, Inc.
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Daniel Wolf and Maia Caplan Kats v. Sprenger + Lang, PLLC
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2014)
Heierli v. Contech Construction Products, Inc.
(District of Columbia, 2011)
In re Kenneth A. Martin
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2014)
Nader v. Latham & Watkins
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Legislative History
Feb. 27, 2008, D.C. Law 17-111, § 2(b), 55 DCR 1847
Nearby Sections
15
§ 16-1001
Definitions.§ 16-1002
Complaint of criminal conduct.§ 16-1005
Hearing; evidence; protection order.§ 16-1006
Jurisdiction.§ 16-1007
Notice to parties.§ 16-101
Parties.§ 16-1021
Definitions.§ 16-1022
Prohibited acts.§ 16-1024
Penalties.§ 16-1025
Prosecution by Attorney General.§ 16-1026
Expungement.§ 16-1031
Arrests.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 16-4423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/16-4423.