District of Columbia Statutes

§ 16-4406 — Validity of agreement to arbitrate.

District of Columbia·Title 16 Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. [Enacted title]·Ch. 44 Arbitration; Revised Uniform Act.
(a)An agreement contained in a record to submit to arbitration any existing or subsequent controversy arising between the parties to the agreement is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable except upon a ground that exists at law or in equity for the revocation of a contract.
(b)The court shall decide whether an agreement to arbitrate exists or a controversy is subject to an agreement to arbitrate.
(c)An arbitrator shall decide whether a condition precedent to arbitrability has been fulfilled and whether a contract containing a valid agreement to arbitrate is enforceable.
(d)If a party to a judicial proceeding challenges the existence of, or claims that a controversy is not subject to, an agreement to arbitrate, the arbitration proceeding may continue pending final resolution of the iss

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District of Columbia § 16-4406 (Validity of agreement to arbitrate.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ABU NASER HOSSAIN v. JMU PROPERTIES, LLC
147 A.3d 816 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
25 case citations
Commonwealth Land Title Ins. v. KCI Technologies, Inc.
922 F.3d 459 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
20 case citations
ROSANNE L. WOODROOF v. JOSEPH F. CUNNINGHAM
147 A.3d 777 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
17 case citations
Menna v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.
987 A.2d 458 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
15 case citations
Giron v. Dodds
35 A.3d 433 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
6 case citations
Washington Teachers' Union Local 6 v. District of Columbia Public Schools
77 A.3d 441 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
5 case citations
Johansson v. Cent. Props., LLC
320 F. Supp. 3d 218 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
1 case citations
Christian v. Uber Technologies, Inc
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Johansson v. Central Properties, LLC
(District of Columbia, 2018)
Matiella v. Murdock Street LLC
(District of Columbia, 2023)
Paragon Systems, Inc. v. Williams
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. v. Theodore Smith
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2020)
Washington Teachers' Union v. District of Columbia Public Schools
207 A.3d 1143 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2019)

Legislative History

Feb. 27, 2008, D.C. Law 17-111, § 2(b), 55 DCR 1847

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗