District of Columbia Statutes
§ 16-4406 — Validity of agreement to arbitrate.
District of Columbia § 16-4406
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 16Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. [Enacted title]
Ch. 44Arbitration; Revised Uniform Act.
This text of District of Columbia § 16-4406 (Validity of agreement to arbitrate.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 16-4406 (2026).
Text
(a)An agreement contained in a record to submit to arbitration any existing or subsequent controversy arising between the parties to the agreement is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable except upon a ground that exists at law or in equity for the revocation of a contract.
(b)The court shall decide whether an agreement to arbitrate exists or a controversy is subject to an agreement to arbitrate.
(c)An arbitrator shall decide whether a condition precedent to arbitrability has been fulfilled and whether a contract containing a valid agreement to arbitrate is enforceable.
(d)If a party to a judicial proceeding challenges the existence of, or claims that a controversy is not subject to, an agreement to arbitrate, the arbitration proceeding may continue pending final resolution of the iss
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
ABU NASER HOSSAIN v. JMU PROPERTIES, LLC
147 A.3d 816 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
Commonwealth Land Title Ins. v. KCI Technologies, Inc.
922 F.3d 459 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
ROSANNE L. WOODROOF v. JOSEPH F. CUNNINGHAM
147 A.3d 777 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
Menna v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.
987 A.2d 458 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
Giron v. Dodds
35 A.3d 433 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
Washington Teachers' Union Local 6 v. District of Columbia Public Schools
77 A.3d 441 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
Johansson v. Cent. Props., LLC
320 F. Supp. 3d 218 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Christian v. Uber Technologies, Inc
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Johansson v. Central Properties, LLC
(District of Columbia, 2018)
Largan Precision Co., Ltd. v. Fisch Sigler, LLP
(District of Columbia, 2022)
Matiella v. Murdock Street LLC
(District of Columbia, 2023)
Paragon Systems, Inc. v. Williams
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2022)
TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. v. Theodore Smith
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2020)
University of the District of Columbia Faculty Assoc/NEA v. Board of Trustees of University of the District of Columbia
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Washington Teachers' Union v. District of Columbia Public Schools
207 A.3d 1143 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2019)
Legislative History
Feb. 27, 2008, D.C. Law 17-111, § 2(b), 55 DCR 1847
Nearby Sections
15
§ 16-1001
Definitions.§ 16-1002
Complaint of criminal conduct.§ 16-1005
Hearing; evidence; protection order.§ 16-1006
Jurisdiction.§ 16-1007
Notice to parties.§ 16-101
Parties.§ 16-1021
Definitions.§ 16-1022
Prohibited acts.§ 16-1024
Penalties.§ 16-1025
Prosecution by Attorney General.§ 16-1026
Expungement.§ 16-1031
Arrests.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 16-4406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/16-4406.