Connecticut Statutes

§ 53a-95 — Unlawful restraint in the first degree: Class D felony.

Connecticut·Title 53a Penal Code·Ch. 952 Penal Code: Offenses
(a)A person is guilty of unlawful restraint in the first degree when he restrains another person under circumstances which expose such other person to a substantial risk of physical injury.
(b)Unlawful restraint in the first degree is a class D felony.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connecticut § 53a-95 (Unlawful restraint in the first degree: Class D felony.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrington v. United States
689 F.3d 124 (Second Circuit, 2012)
95 case citations
Willin v. Ajello
496 F. Supp. 804 (D. Connecticut, 1980)
4 case citations
Rosado v. Warden, No. Cv-93-01662 (May 1, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 5775 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
State v. Simons, No. Cr 96-95455 (Jan. 20, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 240 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Jenkins v. Warden, State Prison, No. 92-1371 (Nov. 14, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11833 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
In Re Stokes, No. Cr 97-0130769 (Nov. 28, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 14811 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
State v. Kelly, No. Cr 1-52961 (Jul. 1, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 3068 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
State v. Yerkes, No. Cr21-55935 (Mar. 16, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2310 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
King v. Commissioner of Corrections, No. Cv98-04120985 (Apr. 16, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 5542 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Musciotto v. Nardelli
(D. Connecticut, 2019)
Tyson v. New Haven
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
Hollis v. Warden, No. Cv 01 0452199 S (May 24, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 6374 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Kryzwicki v. Browne, No. Cv94 313977 S (Oct. 5, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 11270 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Alberty v. Hunter
(D. Connecticut, 2023)

Legislative History

(1969, P.A. 828, S. 97; P.A. 92-260, S. 38.) History: P.A. 92-260 amended Subsec. (a) to replace “the latter” with “such other person”. Cited. 171 C. 395; 182 C. 353; Id., 366; 187 C. 216; Id., 348; 191 C. 604; 194 C. 297; 195 C. 253; 197 C. 298; Id., 309; 198 C. 430; 199 C. 193; 200 C. 9; 201 C. 659; 202 C. 676; 205 C. 352; 220 C. 112; 222 C. 331; 223 C. 180; 224 C. 397; 226 C. 601; 236 C. 112; 237 C. 284; 242 C. 689. Because an unlawful restraint involves the restriction of another person's movements with the intent to interfere substantially with that person's liberty, the crime of unlawful restraint is a specific intent crime. 287 C. 509. Cited. 3 CA 374; 5 CA 424; Id., 586; 6 CA 334; 7 CA 701; 8 CA 620; 9 CA 631; judgment reversed, see 205 C. 352; 10 CA 217; 13 CA 554; 17 CA 234. Specific intent required. Id, 339. Cited. Id., 391; Id., 490; 22 CA 477; 28 CA 581; judgment reversed, see 226 C. 601; 31 CA 20; Id., 312; 36 CA 805; 40 CA 553; 41 CA 701; 42 CA 78; Id., 445; 43 CA 715; 46 CA 486. Immediate flight of victim demonstrates absence of restraint by defendant. 140 CA 393. Cited. 43 CS 211. Subsec. (a): Cited. 174 C. 500; 176 C. 227; 179 C. 381; 185 C. 211; 186 C. 599; 190 C. 104; 197 C. 50; Id., 602; 198 C. 598; Id., 617; 205 C. 39; Id., 61; Id., 437; Id., 528; 206 C. 40; 209 C. 143; 222 C. 87; 227 C. 32; Id., 153; 241 C. 784; 242 C. 523. Cited. 6 CA 697; 8 CA 387; Id., 491; Id., 566; 9 CA 79; Id., 208; 13 CA 667; 14 CA 710; 18 CA 134; Id., 730; 19 CA 631; 21 CA 244; Id., 467; 25 CA 725; 26 CA 574; Id., 641; 32 CA 178; 38 CA 531; Id., 777; 39 CA 45; Id., 789; Id., 832; 41 CA 255; Id., 817. Conviction of both sexual assault and unlawful restraint is not double jeopardy. 47 CA 117.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗