Connecticut Statutes
§ 53a-23 — Use of physical force to resist arrest not justified.
Connecticut § 53a-23
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 53aPenal Code
Ch. 951Penal Code: Statutory Construction; Principles of Criminal Liability
This text of Connecticut § 53a-23 (Use of physical force to resist arrest not justified.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-23 (2026).
Text
A person is not justified in using physical force to resist an arrest by a reasonably identifiable peace officer, whether such arrest is legal or illegal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Odom v. Matteo
772 F. Supp. 2d 377 (D. Connecticut, 2011)
United States v. Crump
62 F. Supp. 2d 560 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
Friend v. Gasparino
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Legislative History
(1969, P.A. 828, S. 22; 1971, P.A. 871, S. 9; P.A. 05-180, S. 3; P.A. 08-150, S. 51; P.A. 10-36, S. 17; P.A. 19-108, S. 5; P.A. 22-117, S. 11.) History: 1971 act deleted definition of peace officer; P.A. 05-180 included a special policeman appointed under Sec. 29-18b within purview of section; P.A. 08-150 included Department of Motor Vehicles inspector appointed under Sec. 14-8 and certified pursuant to Sec. 7-294d within purview of section; P.A. 10-36 replaced “Department of Motor Vehicles inspector appointed” with “motor vehicle inspector designated” and made technical changes, effective July 1, 2010; P.A. 19-108 deleted reference to motor vehicle inspectors, and made a technical change; P.A. 22-117 deleted reference to special policeman appointed under Sec. 29-18b, effective May 27, 2022. Cited. 170 C. 99. Defendant is entitled to a theory of defense instruction as a matter of law when evidence under section is before jury. 178 C. 704. Cited. 191 C. 433; 204 C. 240; 209 C. 75; 221 C. 788. Trial court's instructions pertaining to statute virtually eliminated state's burden of proving that the police officers were acting in the performance of their duties and had effect of depriving defendant of a defense to the charges against him, in violation of his due process rights. 261 C. 553. Cited. 1 CA 709; 5 CA 616; 8 CA 153; Id., 667; 21 CA 326; 23 CA 615; 24 CA 195; Id., 473; judgment reversed in part, see 221 C. 788; 27 CA 49; 40 CA 601; 45 CA 390. Under section, illegality of an arrest is not a defense to charges under Sec. 53a-167c; statute was intended to require an arrestee to submit to an arrest, even though he believes, and may ultimately establish, that the arrest was without probable cause or was otherwise unlawful; it was not intended to require an arrestee to submit to egregiously unlawful conduct, such as an unprovoked assault, by the police in the course of an arrest, whether the arrest was legal or illegal. 79 CA 667. Section restricts common-law right to resist illegal arrest; not applicable to prosecution under Sec. 53a-167a; unnecessary to decide whether this section creates exception to Sec. 53a-20 or common-law right to defend premises. 34 CS 531. Cited. 38 CS 364; Id., 400.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 53a-1
Short title: Penal Code.§ 53a-10
Defense.§ 53a-100
Definitions.§ 53a-100aa
Home invasion: Class A felony.§ 53a-104
Affirmative defense to burglary.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 53a-23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/53a-23.