Connecticut Statutes

§ 53a-223b — Criminal violation of a restraining order: Class D or class C felony.

Connecticut § 53a-223b
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 53aPenal Code
Ch. 952Penal Code: Offenses

This text of Connecticut § 53a-223b (Criminal violation of a restraining order: Class D or class C felony.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-223b (2026).

Text

(a)A person is guilty of criminal violation of a restraining order when (1) (A) a restraining order has been issued against such person pursuant to section 46b-15, or (B) a foreign order of protection, as defined in section 46b-15a, has been issued against such person in a case involving the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against another, and (2) such person, having knowledge of the terms of the order, (A) does not stay away from a person or place in violation of the order, (B) contacts a person in violation of the order, (C) imposes any restraint upon the person or liberty of a person in violation of the order, or (D) threatens, harasses, assaults, molests, sexually assaults or attacks a person in violation of the order.
(b)No person who is listed as a protected

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

(P.A. 02-127, S. 1; P.A. 03-98, S. 6; P.A. 05-147, S. 6; P.A. 11-152, S. 13; P.A. 14-217, S. 124; P.A. 15-85, S. 17.) History: P.A. 03-98 amended Subsec. (a) by adding provisions re foreign order of protection issued after notice and opportunity to be heard in a case involving use of physical force and making technical changes; P.A. 05-147 amended Subsec. (a)(1)(B) to delete the requirement that the foreign order of protection has been issued “after notice and an opportunity to be heard has been provided to such person” and amended Subsec. (b) to increase the penalty from a class A misdemeanor to a class D felony; P.A. 11-152 added new Subsec. (b) to provide that no protected person may be criminally liable for specified offenses and redesignated existing Subsec. (b) as Subsec. (c); P.A. 14-217 amended Subsec. (c) to designate existing provision re class D felony as Subdiv. (1) and amend same to add “Except as provided in subdivision (2) of this subsection,” add Subdiv. (2) re when criminal violation of a restraining order is class C felony, and make a technical change, effective January 1, 2015; P.A. 15-85 added new Subsec. (c) re restraining order respondent not criminally liable for violation of order if respondent causes document filed in family relations matter to be served on protected party in accordance with law and redesignated existing Subsec. (c) as Subsec. (d). Not unconstitutionally vague because a person of ordinary intelligence would have ample warning that terms “stay away from” and “contacts” prohibit distinct conduct; violation of either Subdiv. (1) or (2) of Subsec. (a) requires proof of an element that the other does not and therefore violation is two separate offenses for purposes of double jeopardy. 97 CA 332. Section is not a specific intent crime, and all that is necessary is a general intent that defendant intended to perform the activities that constituted the violation. 151 CA 527.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 53a-223b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/53a-223b.