Connecticut Statutes

§ 53a-136 — Robbery in the third degree: Class D felony.

Connecticut § 53a-136
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 53aPenal Code
Ch. 952Penal Code: Offenses

This text of Connecticut § 53a-136 (Robbery in the third degree: Class D felony.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-136 (2026).

Text

(a)A person is guilty of robbery in the third degree when he commits robbery as defined in section 53a-133.
(b)Robbery in the third degree is a class D felony.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephenson v. Connecticut
639 F. App'x 742 (Second Circuit, 2016)
5 case citations
Thelemaque v. Ashcroft
363 F. Supp. 2d 198 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
3 case citations
Carter v. United States
731 F. Supp. 2d 262 (D. Connecticut, 2010)
3 case citations
Gomez v. Ashcroft
293 F. Supp. 2d 162 (D. Connecticut, 2003)
2 case citations
Baldwin v. Warden, No. Cv 93 1781 S (Oct. 7, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7752 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Velez v. Bates, No. 561843 (Nov. 5, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 14180 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Judd v. Warden, No. Cv00-0003267 (Nov. 12, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 14408 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
James v. Warden-Cheshire, No. Cv 98 0416583s (Aug. 21, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 10106 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Hines v. United States
(D. Connecticut, 2020)
Brodeur v. Champion
(D. Connecticut, 2019)

Legislative History

(1969, P.A. 828, S. 138; P.A. 92-260, S. 60.) History: P.A. 92-260 amended Subsec. (a) to add “as defined in section 53a-133”. Cited. 169 C. 247; 171 C. 105; 181 C. 388; 185 C. 260; 188 C. 591; 190 C. 428; 192 C. 618; 197 C. 314; 198 C. 285; 199 C. 557; 202 C. 224; 205 C. 61; 209 C. 23; 210 C. 435; 218 C. 432; 219 C. 160; 239 C. 235. Rational basis exists for legislature to classify larceny from the person as a more serious offense than simple robbery and therefore the classification did not violate defendant's right to equal protection of the laws. 246 C. 132. Cited. 5 CA 500; 7 CA 27; 8 CA 454; Id., 620; 13 CA 420; Id., 596; 14 CA 205; 16 CA 318; Id., 433; 17 CA 226; 19 CA 423; 20 CA 513; Id., 643; 21 CA 248; Id., 291; 22 CA 216; 24 CA 316; Id., 518; 26 CA 114; 27 CA 780; 35 CA 839; 39 CA 579; Id., 810; 40 CA 250; 44 CA 307; 46 CA 616; Id., 778. Subsec. (a): Cited. 185 C. 402; 201 C. 125; Id., 559; 211 C. 101; 220 C. 487; 242 C. 523. Cited. 8 CA 35; 10 CA 330; 14 CA 493; 35 CA 201; 38 CA 531; 41 CA 255; Id., 584. Jury could reasonably find that defendant's threat was part of the same continuous transaction as the larceny; use or threatened use of a firearm is not an element of the crime. 100 CA 122. Cited. 33 CS 599; 37 CS 520.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 53a-136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/53a-136.