Connecticut § 5-230 Working test periods.

Connecticut Statutes

§ 5-230 — Working test periods.

Connecticut § 5-230

Title 5State Employees

Ch. 67State Personnel Act

This text of Connecticut § 5-230 (Working test periods.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 5-230 (2026).

Text

The Commissioner of Administrative Services shall establish appropriate working test periods of not less than three months nor more than one year for the various classes of positions. Within ten days preceding the termination of the working test period, and at such other times as the commissioner deems appropriate, the appointing authority shall report to the commissioner whether such employee is able and willing to perform his duties in a manner so as to merit permanent appointment. At any time during the working test period, after fair trial, the appointing authority may remove any employee if, in the opinion of such appointing authority, the working test indicates that such employee is unable or unwilling to perform his or her duties so as to merit continuance in such position and shall

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Commissioner of Administrative Services shall establish appropriate working test periods of not less than three months nor more than one year for the various classes of positions. Within ten days preceding the termination of the working test period, and at such other times as the commissioner deems appropriate, the appointing authority shall report to the commissioner whether such employee is able and willing to perform his duties in a manner so as to merit permanent appointment. At any time during the working test period, after fair trial, the appointing authority may remove any employee if, in the opinion of such appointing authority, the working test indicates that such employee is unable or unwilling to perform his or her duties so as to merit continuance in such position and shall report such removal to the commissioner. The name of any employee so removed, but who is considered by the commissioner to be suitable for employment in some other department, agency or institution, may be restored to the candidate list if such list is active. For the purposes of this section, any employee who has served part of a working test period in a position in the classified service who is, pursuant to examination, appointed to, and serves part of a working test period in, a position in a higher classification in a field of work directly related to his or her prior position, from which new position he or she is dismissed, shall, at his or her option, be reappointed to the position which such employee first had and his or her service in the working test period for such first position shall be deemed to include the time spent in the working test period for the higher position.

Legislative History

(1967, P.A. 657, S. 39; P.A. 77-614, S. 66, 610; P.A. 92-165, S. 21, 32; P.A. 13-247, S. 362.) History: P.A. 77-614 replaced personnel commissioner with commissioner of administrative services; P.A. 92-165 changed “employment list” to “candidate list” and made technical changes; P.A. 13-247 replaced “requires” with “deems appropriate” re other times for report, deleted provision re waiver for reports on certain positions at institutions, added “if such list is active” re restoration of employee's name to candidate list and made technical changes, effective July 1, 2013. Notification to plaintiff of decision to drop her communicated the day after termination of 6-month working test period sufficient. 157 C. 126. Cited. 170 C. 541; 174 C. 271; 176 C. 1.