Connecticut Statutes

§ 36b-29 — (Formerly Sec. 36-498). Buyer's remedies.

Connecticut § 36b-29
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 36bConnecticut Securities Law and Business Opportunity Investment Act
Ch. 672aUniform Securities Act

This text of Connecticut § 36b-29 ((Formerly Sec. 36-498). Buyer's remedies.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 36b-29 (2026).

Text

(a)Any person who:
(1)Offers or sells a security in violation of subsection (a) of section 36b-6, 36b-16 or subsection (b) of section 36b-24 or of any regulation or order under section 36b-22 which requires the affirmative approval of sales literature before it is used, or of any condition imposed under subsection (d) of section 36b-18 or subsection (g) or (h) of section 36b-19; or (2) offers or sells or materially assists any person who offers or sells a security by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, who knew or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known of the untruth or omission, the buyer not know

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slainte Investments Ltd. Partnership v. Jeffrey
142 F. Supp. 3d 239 (D. Connecticut, 2015)
15 case citations
Poptech, L.P. v. Stewardship Investment Advisors, LLC
849 F. Supp. 2d 249 (D. Connecticut, 2012)
4 case citations
Gorga v. Uniroyal Chemical Corp.
697 A.2d 731 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
3 case citations
FIH, LLC v. Foundation Capital Partners LLC
176 F. Supp. 3d 52 (D. Connecticut, 2016)
3 case citations
Patriot Exploration, LLC v. SandRidge Energy, Inc.
951 F. Supp. 2d 331 (D. Connecticut, 2013)
2 case citations
Dudrow v. Ernst Young, No. X01-Cv98-0144211 (Nov. 4, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 12513 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
1 case citations
Justice v. Gardner, No. Cv02-0169851s (Aug. 21, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 10533 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Weisbart v. Harlan, No. Cv 990080866 S (Apr. 11, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4514 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Lehn v. Dailey, No. Cv00-0070707s (Feb. 27, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 2256 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)

Legislative History

(P.A. 77-482, S. 30; P.A. 81-292, S. 11; P.A. 87-375, S. 7; P.A. 89-220, S. 6; P.A. 93-169, S. 1, 2; P.A. 03-259, S. 22; P.A. 04-45, S. 6; P.A. 10-141, S. 24, 25.) History: P.A. 81-292 amended Subsec. (a) to increase the rate of interest on a recovery from 6% to 8%; P.A. 87-375 inserted a new Subsec. (b) re remedies for recipients of investment advisory services and relettered the remaining Subsecs., amended Subsec. (c) by substituting “person” for “seller” or “nonseller” and substituting “act or transaction constituting the violation” for “sale” and amended Subsec. (h) by extending the application of the section to persons receiving investment advice; P.A. 89-220 amended Subsec. (b) by adding the reference to registration requirement in Sec. 36-474(c); P.A. 93-169 amended Subsec. (a)(2) to make liable a person who “materially assists any person who offers or sells” a security by means of an untruth or omission and to provide that a condition of liability is that the person “knew or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known of the untruth or omission”, amended Subsec. (f) to add exceptions to the two-year statute of limitations for actions arising out of the intentional misrepresentation or fraud in the purchase or sale of any interest in certain limited partnerships and in the purchase or sale of all other securities, designated provisions of former Subsec. (f) re when a person is prohibited from bringing an action as Subsec. (g) and relettered the remaining Subsecs. accordingly, effective July 1, 1993; Sec. 36-498 transferred to Sec. 36b-29 in 1995; P.A. 03-259 deleted provisions in Subsec. (f)(1) re action pending on July 1, 1993; P.A. 04-45 amended Subsec. (f) to eliminate exception in former Subdiv. (1) and delete Subdiv. (2) designator, to make a conforming technical change, to increase, from one year to two years, the maximum time an action may be brought from the date when misrepresentation or fraud is discovered or should have been discovered and to increase, from three to five years, the maximum time an action may be brought from the date of misrepresentation or fraud; P.A. 10-141 amended Subsecs. (e) and (h) to (j) by replacing references to Sec. 36b-33 with references to Sec. 36b-34, effective June 7, 2010. Annotations to former section 36-498: Cited. 200 C. 172; 230 C. 486. Cited. 10 CA 22. Annotations to present section: Cited. 233 C. 304; 242 C. 17. Where a party seeks equitable relief pursuant to a cause of action that also allows that party to seek legal relief, concurrent legal and equitable jurisdiction exists, and the statute of limitations that would be applicable to bar the legal claim also applies to bar the equitable claim. 49 CA 330. Cited. 45 CS 24.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 36b-29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/36b-29.