Connecticut Statutes

§ 31-249b — Appeal.

Connecticut § 31-249b
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 31Labor
Ch. 567Unemployment Compensation

This text of Connecticut § 31-249b (Appeal.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-249b (2026).

Text

At any time before the board's decision has become final, any party, including the administrator, may appeal such decision, including any claim that the decision violates statutory or constitutional provisions, to the superior court for the judicial district of Hartford or for the judicial district wherein the appellant resides. Any or all parties similarly situated may join in one appeal. In such judicial proceeding the original and five copies of a petition, which shall state the grounds on which a review is sought, shall be filed in the office of the board in a manner prescribed by the appeals division. The chairman of the board shall, within the third business day thereafter, cause the original petition or petitions to be mailed to the clerk of the Superior Court and copy or copies the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spada v. Administrator, No. Cv 00 0065600 S (Sep. 18, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 12077 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Aitchison v. Admin., Unemp. Comp. Act, No. Cv 95 0067140 (Jul. 19, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 8280 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Gionet v. Administrator, No. Cv 93-113664 (May 10, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 4828 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Thomson v. Administrator, Unempl. Comp., No. Cv 990088112 (Nov. 1, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 13582 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Syed v. Administrator, No. Cv-93-0354482 (Oct. 31, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11043 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Bank of South Windsor v. Administrator, No. Cv940542975s (Mar. 6, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2397 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Wills v. Administrator, No. Cv 93-0069802-S (Mar. 10, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2149 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Urbanowicz v. Administrator, No. 391303 (Feb. 13, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 1447 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
The Spot v. Administrator Unemployment Comp., No. 552083 (Sep. 19, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 11282 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Queen Anne Ent. v. Admin. Unemp. Comp. Act, No. 95-010962s (Jun. 5, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6193 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Boardman v. Administrator, Une. C. Act, No. Cv 99-0431724s (Aug. 16, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 10302 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Parikh v. Administrator, No. Cv97-74632 (Jun. 12, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 7310 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Campbell v. the Administrator, No. Cv00-0595308 (Feb. 15, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 2533 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Jones v. Administrator, No. 432002 (Sep. 18, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 11350 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Heath v. Admin., Unemployment Comp. Act, No. Cv 00 0435611 S (Nov. 29, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 15914 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Cavaliere v. Admstr., Unemp. Comp. Act, No. Cv 95-0378407 (Mar. 15, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2133 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Fuce v. Administrator, No. Cv 01-0451198 S (Nov. 20, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 15626 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Butler v. Administrator, Unemployment Comp., No. 00-0439754s (Dec. 6, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 16124 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Engeldrum v. Administrator, No. 423103 (Mar. 13, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4631 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
McCulley v. Adm., Unemp. Comp. Act, No. Cv96 0154447 S (Apr. 10, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 3878 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)

Legislative History

(P.A. 74-339, S. 25, 36; P.A. 75-339; P.A. 76-436, S. 620, 681; P.A. 78-280, S. 1, 5, 127; P.A. 79-376, S. 32; P.A. 80-428; P.A. 81-472, S. 64, 159; P.A. 82-472, S. 107, 183; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-29, S. 14, 82; P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 93-142, S. 4, 7, 8; P.A. 95-220, S. 4–6; P.A. 00-196, S. 20; P.A. 07-193, S. 2; P.A. 16-169, S. 13.) History: P.A. 75-339 allowed appeals to court “in and for the county wherein the appellant resides”; P.A. 76-436 added reference to judicial districts and specified that appeals to supreme court be made in accordance with Sec. 52-7 rather than “in the same manner as is provided in civil actions”, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 78-280 deleted reference to counties and substituted “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” for “Hartford county”; P.A. 79-376 replaced “workmen's compensation” with “workers' compensation”; P.A. 80-428 specified when transcript is to be provided to court where previously transcript was a part of record without exception; P.A. 81-472 removed language concerning the assignment of appeals with the same privileges as workers' compensation appeals, as such workers compensation appeals no longer have preferential status; P.A. 82-472 made a technical correction; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-29 deleted reference to supreme court and substituted appellate court in lieu thereof; P.A. 88-230 replaced “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” with “judicial district of Hartford”, effective September 1, 1991; P.A. 90-98 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1991, to September 1, 1993; P.A. 93-142 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1993, to September 1, 1996, effective June 14, 1993; P.A. 95-220 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1996, to September 1, 1998, effective July 1, 1995; P.A. 00-196 made a technical change; P.A. 07-193 authorized appeal of board's decision, including any claim that decision violates statutory or constitutional provisions; P.A. 16-169 added “in a manner prescribed by the appeals division” re filing petition. Cited. 172 C. 492; 175 C. 562; 177 C. 132; 181 C. 1; 184 C. 317; 192 C. 104; Id., 581; 196 C. 440; 209 C. 381; 238 C. 273. There is no language in this or any other unemployment compensation statute suggesting that court may hear claims on appeal from board over which board lacks jurisdiction. 280 C. 745. Cited. 1 CA 591; 2 CA 1; 5 CA 309; 6 CA 588; 25 CA 130; 34 CA 620; 39 CA 441; 43 CA 779. Plaintiff's failure to appeal timely from trial court's prior dismissal of his unemployment compensation claim concluded his cause of action for unemployment benefits; accordingly, plaintiff's petition for declaratory and injunctive relief based on identical claim arising from the same underlying proceeding was properly dismissed. 93 CA 37. When making a finding of wilful misconduct, reviewing administrative authority must expressly make findings as to all elements listed in the relevant regulation, including a recitation of the facts that are the basis of those findings. 147 CA 661. Reviewing court exceeded the scope of its review by finding facts, and improperly used such facts to determine that board abused its discretion. 191 CA 578. Reviewing court does not try the matter de novo, but only determines whether board acted unreasonably, arbitrarily or illegally. 36 CS 210. Cited. 37 CS 38; 40 CS 305; 44 CS 285.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 31-249b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/31-249b.