Jones v. Administrator, No. 432002 (Sep. 18, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Jones v. Administrator, No. 432002 (Sep. 18, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 11350

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedSeptember 18, 2000

DocketNos. 432002, 432003

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 11350 (Jones v. Administrator, No. 432002 (Sep. 18, 2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Administrator, No. 432002 (Sep. 18, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 11350 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION These are consolidated statutory appeals concerning unemployment compensation. The Employment Security Division of the Board of Review certified the records to the Superior Court. Conn. Gen. Stat. §31-249b. The facts have been found by the Board of Review. The plaintiff, who appears pro se, has not filed a motion to correct the finding. Practice Book § 22-4. He has filed no brief in response to the briefs filed by the Administrator and his former employer. The Court's function in this context is to determine "whether there was any evidence to support in law the conclusions reached." Practice Book §22-9(a). After considering the record, the Court determines that the answer to this question is Yes. The plaintiff essentially asks the Court to make its own findings in the factual dispute at hand, which is something the Court cannot do. Moreover, the record demonstrates that the administrative action complained of was not unreasonable, arbitrary, illegal, or an abuse of discretion.

The appeals are dismissed.

Jon C. Blue Judge of the Superior Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION These are consolidated statutory appeals concerning unemployment compensation. The Employment Security Division of the Board of Review certified the records to the Superior Court. Conn. Gen. Stat. §31-249b. The facts have been found by the Board of Review. The plaintiff, who appears pro se, has not filed a motion to correct the finding. Practice Book § 22-4. He has filed no brief in response to the briefs filed by the Administrator and his former employer. The Court's function in this context is to determine "whether there was any evidence to support in law the conclusions reached." Practice Book §22-9(a). After considering the record, the Court determines that the answer to this question is Yes. The plaintiff essentially asks the Court to make its own findings in the factual dispute at hand, which is something the Court cannot do. Moreover, the record demonstrates that the administrative action complained of was not unreasonable, arbitrary, illegal, or an abuse of discretion.

The appeals are dismissed.

Jon C. Blue Judge of the Superior Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 11350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-administrator-no-432002-sep-18-2000-connsuperct-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack