California Statutes
§ 47. — 47. (Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 131, Sec. 9.)
A privileged publication or broadcast is one made:
(a)In the proper discharge of an official duty.
(b)In any (1) legislative proceeding, (2) judicial proceeding, (3) in any other official proceeding authorized by law, or (4) in the initiation or course of any other proceeding authorized by law and reviewable pursuant
to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1084) of Title 1 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, except as follows:
(1)An allegation or averment contained in any pleading or affidavit filed in an action for marital dissolution or legal separation made of or concerning a person by or against whom no affirmative relief is prayed in the action shall not be a privileged publication or broadcast as to the person making the allegation or averment within the meaning of this se
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 47. (47. (Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 131, Sec. 9.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Religious Technology Center Church of Scientology International v. Larry Wollersheim Leta Schlosser Richard Ofshe Margaret Singer Charles B. O'Reilly
971 F.2d 364 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Mirmehdi v. United States
689 F.3d 975 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Thomas Tellez v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Inc., and Does I-X, Inclusive
817 F.2d 536 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Barbara A. Brocklesby v. United States of America, and Jeppesen and Company
767 F.2d 1288 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Gen-Probe, Inc. v. Amoco Corp., Inc.
926 F. Supp. 948 (S.D. California, 1996)
Oei v. N. Star Capital Acquisitions, LLC
486 F. Supp. 2d 1089 (C.D. California, 2006)
Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a Corporation
269 F.2d 375 (Ninth Circuit, 1959)
Orlando Cepeda v. Cowles Magazines and Broadcasting, Inc., a Corporation
328 F.2d 869 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
Crane v. Arizona Republic
972 F.2d 1511 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Arnold G. Dorsey, A.K.A. Engelbert Humperdinck v. National Enquirer, Inc.
973 F.2d 1431 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Hoesl v. United States
451 F. Supp. 1170 (N.D. California, 1978)
Dong v. Board of Trustees
191 Cal. App. 3d 1572 (California Court of Appeal, 1987)
Newsom v. Moore (In Re Moore)
186 B.R. 962 (N.D. California, 1995)
Crane v. the Arizona Republic
972 F.2d 1511 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corporation
745 F.2d 1283 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
Crane v. Arizona Republic
729 F. Supp. 698 (C.D. California, 1989)
Clement v. American Greetings Corp.
636 F. Supp. 1326 (S.D. California, 1986)
Service Engineering Co. v. Southwest Marine, Inc.
719 F. Supp. 1500 (N.D. California, 1989)
Carlsberg v. Gatzek
442 F. Supp. 813 (C.D. California, 1977)
Caesar Electronics Inc. v. Andrews
905 F.2d 287 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 131, Sec. 9. (AB 1754) Effective January 1, 2024.