California Statutes
§ 17529.5. — 17529.5. (Amended by Stats. 2005, Ch. 247, Sec. 1.)
California·Code BPC Business and Professions Code - BPC·Div. 7. DIVISION 7. GENERAL BUSINESS REGULATIONS·Part 3. PART 3. REPRESENTATIONS TO THE PUBLIC·Ch. 1. CHAPTER 1. Advertising·Art. 1.8. ARTICLE 1.8. Restrictions On Unsolicited Commercial E-mail Advertisers
(a)It is unlawful for any person or entity to advertise in a commercial e-mail advertisement either sent from California or sent to a California electronic mail address under any of the following circumstances:
(1)The e-mail advertisement contains or is accompanied by a third-party’s domain name without the permission of the third party.
(2)The e-mail advertisement contains or is accompanied by falsified,
misrepresented, or forged header information. This paragraph does not apply to truthful information used by a third party who has been lawfully authorized by the advertiser to use that information.
(3)The e-mail advertisement has a subject line that a person knows would be likely to mislead a recipient, acting reasonably under the circumstances, about a material fact regarding t
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 17529.5. (17529.5. (Amended by Stats. 2005, Ch. 247, Sec. 1.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Balsam v. Tucows Inc.
627 F.3d 1158 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
MySpace, Inc. v. Wallace
498 F. Supp. 2d 1293 (C.D. California, 2007)
Asis Internet Services v. Consumerbargaingiveaways, LLC
622 F. Supp. 2d 935 (N.D. California, 2009)
Asis Internet Services v. Vistaprint USA, Inc.
617 F. Supp. 2d 989 (N.D. California, 2009)
Silverstein v. Keynetics Inc.
192 F. Supp. 3d 1045 (N.D. California, 2016)
Hypertouch, Inc. v. Azoogle.com, Inc.
386 F. App'x 701 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Asis Internet Services v. azoogle.com, Inc.
357 F. App'x 112 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Wilkins v. PayPal, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2023)
Julia G. Durward v. One Technologies LLC
(C.D. California, 2019)
Brian Lynch v. AML Network Ltd.
(C.D. California, 2021)
Holden v. Fluent, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2020)
Diaz v. One Technologies, LLC
(C.D. California, 2022)
Kleffman v. Vonage Holdings Corp.
387 F. App'x 696 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kleffman v. Vonage Holdings
(Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Whittaker v. Tactical USA LLC
(E.D. California, 2024)
John Malaspina v. American Airlines, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2025)
William Silverstein v. Keynetics, Inc.
(Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2005, Ch. 247, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2006.