California Statutes

§ 17529.5. — 17529.5. (Amended by Stats. 2005, Ch. 247, Sec. 1.)

California·Code BPC Business and Professions Code - BPC·Div. 7. DIVISION 7. GENERAL BUSINESS REGULATIONS·Part 3. PART 3. REPRESENTATIONS TO THE PUBLIC·Ch. 1. CHAPTER 1. Advertising·Art. 1.8. ARTICLE 1.8. Restrictions On Unsolicited Commercial E-mail Advertisers
(a)It is unlawful for any person or entity to advertise in a commercial e-mail advertisement either sent from California or sent to a California electronic mail address under any of the following circumstances:
(1)The e-mail advertisement contains or is accompanied by a third-party’s domain name without the permission of the third party.
(2)The e-mail advertisement contains or is accompanied by falsified, misrepresented, or forged header information. This paragraph does not apply to truthful information used by a third party who has been lawfully authorized by the advertiser to use that information.
(3)The e-mail advertisement has a subject line that a person knows would be likely to mislead a recipient, acting reasonably under the circumstances, about a material fact regarding t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California § 17529.5. (17529.5. (Amended by Stats. 2005, Ch. 247, Sec. 1.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Balsam v. Tucows Inc.
627 F.3d 1158 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
25 case citations
MySpace, Inc. v. Wallace
498 F. Supp. 2d 1293 (C.D. California, 2007)
8 case citations
Asis Internet Services v. Consumerbargaingiveaways, LLC
622 F. Supp. 2d 935 (N.D. California, 2009)
7 case citations
Asis Internet Services v. Vistaprint USA, Inc.
617 F. Supp. 2d 989 (N.D. California, 2009)
3 case citations
Silverstein v. Keynetics Inc.
192 F. Supp. 3d 1045 (N.D. California, 2016)
2 case citations
Hypertouch, Inc. v. Azoogle.com, Inc.
386 F. App'x 701 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
1 case citations
Asis Internet Services v. azoogle.com, Inc.
357 F. App'x 112 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
1 case citations
Wilkins v. PayPal, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2023)
Brian Lynch v. AML Network Ltd.
(C.D. California, 2021)
Holden v. Fluent, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2020)
Diaz v. One Technologies, LLC
(C.D. California, 2022)
Kleffman v. Vonage Holdings Corp.
387 F. App'x 696 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kleffman v. Vonage Holdings
(Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Whittaker v. Tactical USA LLC
(E.D. California, 2024)

Legislative History

Amended by Stats. 2005, Ch. 247, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2006.

Nearby Sections

8
View on official source ↗