Williams v. State

260 S.W.3d 426, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1059, 2008 WL 3295300
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 12, 2008·No. ED 90252·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Ronald Williams, appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion *427 would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 260 S.W.3d 426, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1059, 2008 WL 3295300 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

260 S.W.3d 426 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shuck v. CICI Enterprises, L.P.
260 S.W.3d 426 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)