Williams v. State

179 S.W.3d 306, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1737, 2005 WL 3159620
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 2005·No. ED 85674·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Williams (Williams) appeals the trial court’s judgment, which denied his Rule '29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court properly found that Williams was not entitled to relief under Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 179 S.W.3d 306, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1737, 2005 WL 3159620 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

179 S.W.3d 306 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. INTERNATIONAL LIGHTING MANUFACTURING CO.
179 S.W.3d 306 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)