Williams v. State

101 S.W.3d 322, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 439, 2003 WL 1494244
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 304
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 2003·No. No. ED 81487·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Marcellus Williams (“mov-ant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant seeks to vacate his convictions and sentences for robbery in the first degree, section 569.020 RSMo 1994,1 armed criminal action, section 571.015, and unlawful use of a weapon, section 571.030. Movant was sentenced as a persistent offender to a term of twenty years imprisonment for robbery in the first degree, a concurrent term of twenty years imprisonment for armed criminal action, and a concurrent term of seven years imprisonment for unlawful use of a weapon. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 101 S.W.3d 322, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 439, 2003 WL 1494244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

101 S.W.3d 322 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.