Williams v. State

136 S.W.3d 846, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 901, 2004 WL 1381111

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1256 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 22, 2004·No. No. ED 83326·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Brian Williams, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. Movant was sentenced to concurrent terms of fifteen years’ imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Williams v. State, 136 S.W.3d 846, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 901, 2004 WL 1381111 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

136 S.W.3d 846 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.