Williams v. State

119 S.W.3d 618, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1811, 2003 WL 22703866
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 304
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 18, 2003·No. No. WD 62330·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph V. Williams appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. In his motion for post-conviction relief, Williams charged his attorney with ineffective assistance for failing to object when the prosecution mentioned his silence during an interview with a police detective. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 119 S.W.3d 618, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1811, 2003 WL 22703866 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

119 S.W.3d 618 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.