Williams v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Joseph V. Williams appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. In his motion for post-conviction relief, Williams charged his attorney with ineffective assistance for failing to object when the prosecution mentioned his silence during an interview with a police detective. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
119 S.W.3d 618 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.