Williams v. State
168 S.W.3d 556, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 733, 2005 WL 1155034
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1256 →
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, Elmer Williams, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, [557]*557setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 168 S.W.3d 556, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 733, 2005 WL 1155034 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
168 S.W.3d 556 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.