Williams v. State

180 S.W.3d 50, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1889, 2005 WL 3470523
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1256
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 2005·No. ED 85990·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Belinda Williams, appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance during cross-examination of movant’s daughter.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 180 S.W.3d 50, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1889, 2005 WL 3470523 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

180 S.W.3d 50 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
180 S.W.3d 50 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)