Shuck v. CICI Enterprises, L.P.
260 S.W.3d 426, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2008 WL 3295171
Opinion
ORDER
Annette Shuck appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her three-count petition. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shuck v. CICI Enterprises, L.P., 260 S.W.3d 426, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2008 WL 3295171 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
260 S.W.3d 426 (Shuck v. CICI Enterprises, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
260 S.W.3d 426 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)