Shuck v. CICI Enterprises, L.P.
260 S.W.3d 426, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2008 WL 3295171
This text of 260 S.W.3d 426 (Shuck v. CICI Enterprises, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shuck v. CICI Enterprises, L.P., 260 S.W.3d 426, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2008 WL 3295171 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
Annette Shuck appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her three-count petition. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Williams v. State
260 S.W.3d 426 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
260 S.W.3d 426, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2008 WL 3295171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shuck-v-cici-enterprises-lp-moctapp-2008.