Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

241 S.W.3d 874, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 21, 2008 WL 65257

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 8, 2008

DocketWD 67662

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 S.W.3d 874 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 241 S.W.3d 874, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 21, 2008 WL 65257 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Brenda Williams appeals the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Williams claims trial counsel was ineffective because he refused to allow her to testify in her own defense.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Brenda Williams appeals the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Williams claims trial counsel was ineffective because he refused to allow her to testify in her own defense.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 S.W.3d 874, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 21, 2008 WL 65257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack