Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Williams v. State

Williams v. State

181 S.W.3d 606, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 35, 2006 WL 44238
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1256 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 10, 2006·No. No. ED 85229·Published

Opinion

[607]*607ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Terrón Williams, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by giving him erroneous advice regarding when he would be eligible for parole.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 181 S.W.3d 606, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 35, 2006 WL 44238 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

181 S.W.3d 606 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.