Williams v. State

241 S.W.3d 874, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 21, 2008 WL 65257
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 8, 2008·No. WD 67662·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Brenda Williams appeals the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Williams claims trial counsel was ineffective because he refused to allow her to testify in her own defense.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 241 S.W.3d 874, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 21, 2008 WL 65257 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

241 S.W.3d 874 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apel v. State
241 S.W.3d 874 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)