Walker v. State
This text of 686 So. 2d 758 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
George WALKER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee; appellant pro se, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has also filed a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, and considered the issue raised by appellant, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of appellant's probation, and the sentence imposed. However, we note that it does not appear that a written order was entered revoking appellant's probation. On remand, the trial court is directed to *759 enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant's probation. Appellant need not be present.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.
MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 So. 2d 758, 1997 WL 24676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.