Grubbs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grubbs v. State

763 So. 2d 1233, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6807, 2000 WL 718175

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 2000

DocketNo. 1D99-922

StatusPublished

This text of 763 So. 2d 1233 (Grubbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grubbs v. State, 763 So. 2d 1233, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6807, 2000 WL 718175 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation, as there was sufficient evidence to support the revocation in accordance with the court’s oral pronouncement. However, because it does not appear that a written revocation order was entered the case is remanded for entry of a written order consistent with the oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 [1234]*1234So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Simonetta v. State, 685 So.2d 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation, as there was sufficient evidence to support the revocation in accordance with the court’s oral pronouncement. However, because it does not appear that a written revocation order was entered the case is remanded for entry of a written order consistent with the oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 [1234]*1234So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Simonetta v. State, 685 So.2d 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 So. 2d 1233, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6807, 2000 WL 718175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grubbs-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack