Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cozart v. State

Cozart v. State

823 So. 2d 234, 2002 WL 1770703
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 2002·No. 1D02-0607·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

823 So.2d 234 (2002)

Adam Joseph COZART, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D02-0607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 2, 2002.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant's revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, we note that the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation. We thus remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED.

MINER, KAHN, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cozart v. State, 823 So. 2d 234, 2002 WL 1770703 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

823 So. 2d 234 (Cozart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGee v. State
872 So. 2d 1016 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Baldwin v. State
855 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Travis v. State
858 So. 2d 1095 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Twitty v. State
847 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Hallman v. State
845 So. 2d 265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Taylor v. State
840 So. 2d 371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)