Hallman v. State
845 So. 2d 265, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6759, 2003 WL 21034166
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2003·No. No. 1D02-2694·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Haying reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. Cozart v. State, 823 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hallman v. State, 845 So. 2d 265, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6759, 2003 WL 21034166 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
845 So. 2d 265 (Hallman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dunklin v. State
135 So. 3d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Veazy v. State
113 So. 3d 1226 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2013)
Pressley v. State
903 So. 2d 1053 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)