Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hallman v. State

Hallman v. State

845 So. 2d 265, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6759, 2003 WL 21034166
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-2694
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 845 So. 2d 265 (Hallman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hallman v. State, 845 So. 2d 265, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6759, 2003 WL 21034166 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Haying reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. Cozart v. State, 823 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, C.J., and BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunklin v. State
135 So. 3d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Veazy v. State
113 So. 3d 1226 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2013)
Pressley v. State
903 So. 2d 1053 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
845 So. 2d 265, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6759, 2003 WL 21034166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallman-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.