Pressley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pressley v. State

903 So. 2d 1053, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9493, 2005 WL 1420887

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 2005·No. No. 1D04-5612·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, we remand for the trial court [1054]*1054to enter such an order. See Hallman v. State, 845 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, we remand for the trial court [1054]*1054to enter such an order. See Hallman v. State, 845 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Pressley v. State, 903 So. 2d 1053, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9493, 2005 WL 1420887 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

903 So. 2d 1053 (Pressley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related