Pressley v. State

903 So. 2d 1053, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9493, 2005 WL 1420887
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 2005
DocketNo. 1D04-5612
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 903 So. 2d 1053 (Pressley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pressley v. State, 903 So. 2d 1053, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9493, 2005 WL 1420887 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, we remand for the trial court [1054]*1054to enter such an order. See Hallman v. State, 845 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunklin v. State
135 So. 3d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
903 So. 2d 1053, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9493, 2005 WL 1420887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pressley-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.