Dunklin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dunklin v. State

135 So. 3d 349, 2013 WL 6097543, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18526

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 20, 2013

DocketNo. 1D13-2512

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 So. 3d 349 (Dunklin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunklin v. State, 135 So. 3d 349, 2013 WL 6097543, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18526 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Finding no reversible error, we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the judgment and sentence. However, because the record provides no indication that the trial court entered a written order of revocation of probation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. See Pressley v. State, 903 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Hallman v. State, 845 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Finding no reversible error, we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the judgment and sentence. However, because the record provides no indication that the trial court entered a written order of revocation of probation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. See Pressley v. State, 903 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Hallman v. State, 845 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 So. 3d 349, 2013 WL 6097543, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunklin-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack