Twitty v. State

847 So. 2d 554, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8225, 2003 WL 21250806
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 2, 2003
DocketNo. 1D01-4369
StatusPublished

This text of 847 So. 2d 554 (Twitty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Twitty v. State, 847 So. 2d 554, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8225, 2003 WL 21250806 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter amended orders of revocation reflecting Twitty’s plea of not guilty to the probation violation and his amended sentences as to the misdemeanor counts, we remand for the trial court to enter such orders. See Cozart v. State, 823 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

DAVIS, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Cozart v. State
823 So. 2d 234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 So. 2d 554, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8225, 2003 WL 21250806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twitty-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.