Twitty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Twitty v. State

847 So. 2d 554, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8225, 2003 WL 21250806

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 2, 2003·No. No. 1D01-4369·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter amended orders of revocation reflecting Twitty’s plea of not guilty to the probation violation and his amended sentences as to the misdemeanor counts, we remand for the trial court to enter such orders. See Cozart v. State, 823 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

DAVIS, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter amended orders of revocation reflecting Twitty’s plea of not guilty to the probation violation and his amended sentences as to the misdemeanor counts, we remand for the trial court to enter such orders. See Cozart v. State, 823 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

DAVIS, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Twitty v. State, 847 So. 2d 554, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8225, 2003 WL 21250806 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

847 So. 2d 554 (Twitty v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related