Zabielski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zabielski v. State

831 So. 2d 243, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17489, 2002 WL 31641603

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 25, 2002·No. No. 1D02-0740·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred and affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation, and imposition of judgment and sentence. The record reflects that the trial court failed to enter a written order of violation of probation. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order, consistent with its oral order, revoking the appellant’s probation. See [244] Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758, 758-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS and Van NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred and affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation, and imposition of judgment and sentence. The record reflects that the trial court failed to enter a written order of violation of probation. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order, consistent with its oral order, revoking the appellant’s probation. See [244] Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758, 758-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS and Van NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Zabielski v. State, 831 So. 2d 243, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17489, 2002 WL 31641603 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

831 So. 2d 243 (Zabielski v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related