Sykes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sykes v. State

823 So. 2d 214, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10802, 2002 WL 1758283

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 31, 2002

DocketNo. 1D02-0411

StatusPublished

This text of 823 So. 2d 214 (Sykes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sykes v. State, 823 So. 2d 214, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10802, 2002 WL 1758283 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, we note that the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation listing the conditions of probation violated. We thus remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, C.J., DAVIS, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, we note that the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation listing the conditions of probation violated. We thus remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, C.J., DAVIS, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

823 So. 2d 214, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10802, 2002 WL 1758283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sykes-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack