Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah

521 F. Supp. 1072, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9948
CourtDistrict Court, D. Utah
DecidedJune 19, 1981
DocketCiv. C 75-408
StatusPublished
Cited by35 cases

This text of 521 F. Supp. 1072 (Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 521 F. Supp. 1072, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9948 (D. Utah 1981).

Opinion

JENKINS, District Judge.

The Ute Indian Tribe filed a complaint with this Court on October 15,1975, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief establishing the exterior boundaries of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, defining the force and effect of the Tribe’s Law and Order Code within those boundaries, and restraining the defendants from interfering with the enforcement of that Code. 1 The Tribe, a federally recognized, sovereign Indian tribe, 2 operates under a constitution and by-laws adopted in 1936 and approved by the Secretary of the Interior in 1937. 3 Artiele I of the tribal constitution defines the territory claimed by the Tribe for jurisdictional purposes:

The jurisdiction of the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation shall extend to the territory within the original confines of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation as set forth by Executive Orders of October 3, 1861 and January 5, 1882, and by the Acts of Congress approved May 27, 1902, and June 19, 1902, and to such other lands without such boundaries as may hereafter be added thereto under any law of the United States, except as otherwise provided by law. [Emphasis added.]

Among the powers vested in the Tribal Business Committee, the Tribe’s elected governing body, are the following:

Article VI — Powers of the Tribal Business Committee

Section 1. Enumerated powers. — The Tribal Business Committee of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation shall exercise the following powers, subject to any limitations imposed by the statutes or the Constitution of the United States, and subject further to all express restrictions upon such powers contained in this Constitution and By-laws, and subject to re *1076 view by the Ute Bands themselves at any annual or special meeting:
******
(h) To levy taxes upon members of the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Our-ay Reservation, and to require the performance of community labor in lieu thereof, and to levy taxes and license fees, subject to review by the Secretary of the Interior, upon non-members doing business within the Reservation.
(i) To exclude from the territory of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation persons not legally entitled to reside therein, under ordinances which shall be subject to review by the Secretary of the Interior.
******
(j) To enact resolutions or ordinances, not inconsistent with Article II of this Constitution governing adoption and abandonment of members, and to keep at all times a correct roll of the members of the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Our-ay Reservation.
(k) To promulgate and enforce ordinances, which shall be subject to review by the Secretary of the Interior, governing the conduct of members of the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, and providing for the maintenance of law and order and the administration of justice by establishing a Reservation Indian Court and defining its duties and powers.
(/) To safeguard and promote the peace, safety, morals and general welfare of the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Our-ay Reservation by regulating the conduct of trade and the use and disposition of property upon the Reservation, provided that any ordinance directly affecting nonmembers of the Reservation shall be subject to review by the Secretary of the Interior.
(m) To charter subordinate organizations for economic purposes, and to regulate the activities of co-operative associations of members of the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation by ordinance, provided that any such ordinance shall be subject to review by the Secretary of the Interior.
(n) To regulate the inheritance of property, real and personal, other than allotted lands, within the territory of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, subject to review by the Secretary of the Interior.
(o) To regulate the domestic relations of members of the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation by ordinances which shall be subject to review by the Secretary of the Interior.
(p) To provide for the appointment of guardians for minors and mental incompetents by ordinances or resolutions which shall be subject to review by the Secretary of the Interior.
******

For many years, it seemed to the Ute’s non-Indian neighbors that these powers, as well as others, lay dormant as far as non-Indian affairs were concerned. To many, the concept of Indian tribal government seemed wholly irrelevant to their businesses and daily lives. Over those same years, however, the Ute Indian Tribe did not remain passive. The Utes, with the support and encouragement of their trustee, the United States government, have made continuous efforts to improve the sophistication and effectiveness of their tribal institutions in response to changing times and circumstances. 4 Naturally, as the Utes have gained the economic wherewithal to do so, they have sought a greater share of autonomy and control over their own lives and community affairs. It was inevitable that this quest for tribal autonomy would find expression in the promulgation of tribal law. 5

The Tribe operated a tribal government and an Indian court for many years prior to *1077 1975. 5A As tribal operations expanded and the demand on tribal institutions increased, the Tribe sought to recodify and expand its growing body of ordinances, resulting in the enactment and publication of the Law and Order Code of the Ute Indian Tribe (hereinafter “Ute Law and Order Code”) which was approved by the Secretary of the Interior through the Phoenix Area Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Trial Transcript at 55 (Testimony of Wm. F. Streitz), and became effective on September 15, 1975. 6

Promulgation of the Ute Law and Order Code raised immediate protest from the defendant municipalities, Duchesne and Roosevelt, and defendant Duchesne County, all of which are within the original boundaries of the Uintah Indian Reservation. 7 The defendants complained that they were wrongfully included within the territorial jurisdiction of the Ute Tribe under the Ute Law and Order Code 8 and officials of the *1078 defendants urged their constituents to resist the enforcement of the new code. The State of Utah complained that its authority was likewise impaired. 9

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untitled Case
D. Utah, 2026
Boulter v. Noble Energy
Tenth Circuit, 2024
Jones v. United States
Federal Claims, 2023
Pueblo Of Jemez v. United States
366 F. Supp. 3d 1234 (D. New Mexico, 2018)
UTE Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. Lawrence
312 F. Supp. 3d 1219 (D. Utah, 2018)
Hackford v. State of Utah
845 F.3d 1325 (Tenth Circuit, 2017)
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. Myton
835 F.3d 1255 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah
935 F. Supp. 1473 (D. Utah, 1996)
United States v. Cuch
79 F.3d 987 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
Hagen v. Utah
510 U.S. 399 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Hackford v. Babbitt
14 F.3d 1457 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
State v. Perank
858 P.2d 927 (Utah Supreme Court, 1993)
State v. Gardner
844 P.2d 293 (Utah Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Gardner
827 P.2d 980 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1992)
State v. Hagen
802 P.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1990)
State v. Coando
784 P.2d 1228 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 F. Supp. 1072, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ute-indian-tribe-v-state-of-utah-utd-1981.