FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 14
Transferred
25 U.S.C. § 463
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 463 (Transferred) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 463.
Text
Transferred
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Morton v. Ruiz
415 U.S. 199 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.
240 F.3d 1081 (D.C. Circuit, 2001)
Beulah Chase v. Roland McMasters Jack Smith, Jr., Wayne Turner, Arlyn Wadholm and Russel Pederson
573 F.2d 1011 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
Michigan Gambling Opposition v. Kempthorne
525 F.3d 23 (D.C. Circuit, 2008)
Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co. v. Quinault Indian Nation
929 P.2d 379 (Washington Supreme Court, 1996)
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co.
2 F.3d 1023 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.
455 F.2d 432 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah
521 F. Supp. 1072 (D. Utah, 1981)
United States v. Hess
194 F.3d 1164 (Tenth Circuit, 1999)
South Dakota v. United States Department of the Interior
69 F.3d 878 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
Wichita & Affiliated Tribes v. Hodel
788 F.2d 765 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes v. R. E. Nordwick
378 F.2d 426 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Glen D. Dupris
612 F.2d 319 (Eighth Circuit, 1979)
Plains Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc. v. Pueblo of Laguna and United States of America
542 F.2d 1375 (Tenth Circuit, 1976)
Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw Indians v. Babbitt
116 F. Supp. 2d 155 (District of Columbia, 2000)
Russ v. Wilkins
410 F. Supp. 579 (N.D. California, 1976)
Bowman v. Udall
243 F. Supp. 672 (District of Columbia, 1965)
Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. United States
21 Cl. Ct. 176 (Court of Claims, 1990)
Oneida Tribe of Indians v. Village of Hobart
542 F. Supp. 2d 908 (E.D. Wisconsin, 2008)
Crow Tribe of Indians v. United States
657 F. Supp. 573 (D. Montana, 1985)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section 463 was editorially reclassified as section 5103 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Restoration of Vacant and Undisposed-of Ceded Lands in Certain Indian Reservations
Pub. L. 85–420, May 19, 1958, 72 Stat. 121, which provided that lands classified as vacant and undisposed-of ceded lands (including townsite lots) on the Indian reservations at Klamath River, California, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, Crow, Montana, Fort Peck, Montana, and Spokane, Washington, would be restored to tribal ownership, subject to valid existing rights, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Codification
Section 463 was editorially reclassified as section 5103 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Restoration of Vacant and Undisposed-of Ceded Lands in Certain Indian Reservations
Pub. L. 85–420, May 19, 1958, 72 Stat. 121, which provided that lands classified as vacant and undisposed-of ceded lands (including townsite lots) on the Indian reservations at Klamath River, California, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, Crow, Montana, Fort Peck, Montana, and Spokane, Washington, would be restored to tribal ownership, subject to valid existing rights, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/463.