FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 21
Congressional findings
25 U.S.C. § 1901
Title25 — Indians
Chapter21 — INDIAN CHILD WELFARE
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 1901 (Congressional findings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 1901.
Text
Recognizing the special relationship between the United States and the Indian tribes and their members and the Federal responsibility to Indian people, the Congress finds—
(1)that clause 3, section 8, article I of the United States Constitution provides that "The Congress shall have Power * * * To regulate Commerce * * * with Indian tribes 1" and, through this and other constitutional authority, Congress has plenary power over Indian affairs;
(2)that Congress, through statutes, treaties, and the general course of dealing with Indian tribes, has assumed the responsibility for the protection and preservation of Indian tribes and their resources;
(3)that there is no resource that is more vital to the continued existence and integrity of Indian tribes than their children and that the United
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield
490 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1989)
in Interest of L.M
2018 COA 57 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2018)
People in Interest of M.V
2018 COA 163 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2018)
Sacramento Cnty. Dep't of Child v. J.C. (In re A.W.)
251 Cal. Rptr. 3d 50 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2019)
Matter of Adoption of a Child of Indian Heritage
543 A.2d 925 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1988)
Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D
1985 OK 93 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1985)
James R. v. Cindy R.
41 Cal. App. 4th 1483 (California Court of Appeal, 1996)
Haaland v. Brackeen
599 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 2023)
Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.
2017 UT 59 (Utah Supreme Court, 2017)
In The Interest Of A.w. And S.w., Minor Children, Woodbury County Attorney And A.w. And S.w., Minor Children Vs. Iowa
741 N.W.2d 793 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2007)
A.D.T. v. State
2008 UT App 477 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2008)
Brackeen v. Haaland
994 F.3d 249 (Fifth Circuit, 2021)
Native Village of Tununak v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services
303 P.3d 431 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2013)
Navajo Nation v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
284 P.3d 29 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2012)
In Re the Welfare of S.N.R.
617 N.W.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2000)
Quinn v. Walters
881 P.2d 795 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)
R.R. v. Superior Court
180 Cal. App. 4th 185 (California Court of Appeal, 2009)
In re E.G.M.
750 S.E.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
Matter of L.H., YINC
2021 MT 199 (Montana Supreme Court, 2021)
Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Van Hunnik
993 F. Supp. 2d 1017 (D. South Dakota, 2014)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–608, §2, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3069.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title
Pub. L. 95–608, §1, Nov. 8, 1987, 92 Stat. 3069, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978'."
Short Title
Pub. L. 95–608, §1, Nov. 8, 1987, 92 Stat. 3069, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978'."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 1901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/1901.