FEDERAL · 16 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—ESTABLISHMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
Civil and criminal jurisdiction
16 U.S.C. § 480
Title16 — Conservation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—ESTABLISHMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
This text of 16 U.S.C. § 480 (Civil and criminal jurisdiction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
16 U.S.C. § 480.
Text
The jurisdiction, both civil and criminal, over persons within national forests shall not be affected or changed by reason of their existence, except so far as the punishment of offenses against the United States therein is concerned; the intent and meaning of this provision being that the State wherein any such national forest is situated shall not, by reason of the establishment thereof, lose its jurisdiction, nor the inhabitants thereof their rights and privileges as citizens, or be absolved from their duties as citizens of the State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Carmack
329 U.S. 230 (Supreme Court, 1947)
United States v. County of Fresno
429 U.S. 452 (Supreme Court, 1977)
United States v. Fields
516 F.3d 923 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. State of California
655 F.2d 914 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
Wilson v. Cook
327 U.S. 474 (Supreme Court, 1946)
UTE Indian Tribe v. Utah
773 F.2d 1087 (Tenth Circuit, 1985)
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah
521 F. Supp. 1072 (D. Utah, 1981)
United States v. Gabrion
648 F.3d 307 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
The Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power Commission, Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors
489 F.2d 1207 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Tommy A. Srnsky David M. Srnsky
271 F.3d 595 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
Stupak-Thrall v. United States
70 F.3d 881 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Thompson
811 F. Supp. 635 (D. Utah, 1993)
Hackford v. State of Utah
845 F.3d 1325 (Tenth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Rainbow Family
695 F. Supp. 314 (E.D. Texas, 1988)
Koren v. Martin Marietta Services, Inc.
997 F. Supp. 196 (D. Puerto Rico, 1998)
Georgia Pacific Corporation v. County of Mendocino
357 F. Supp. 380 (N.D. California, 1973)
Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Thomas
932 F. Supp. 368 (District of Columbia, 1996)
State v. Quick
806 P.2d 907 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1991)
Jimenez v. Fourth Judicial District Attorney's Office
663 F. App'x 584 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Farrell Wayne Cross
497 S.W.3d 271 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)
Source Credit
History
(June 4, 1897, ch. 2, §1, 30 Stat. 36; Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, §12, 36 Stat. 963.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Provisions substantially in the language of this section are contained in section 12 of act Mar. 1, 1911, applicable to national forest lands acquired on the recommendation of the National Forest Reservation Commission under sections 500, 515 to 519, 521, 552 and 563 of this title.
"National forests" and "national forest" substituted in text for "forest reservations" and "reservation", respectively, on authority of act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, 34 Stat. 1269, which provided that forest reserves shall hereafter be known as national forests.
Codification
Provisions substantially in the language of this section are contained in section 12 of act Mar. 1, 1911, applicable to national forest lands acquired on the recommendation of the National Forest Reservation Commission under sections 500, 515 to 519, 521, 552 and 563 of this title.
"National forests" and "national forest" substituted in text for "forest reservations" and "reservation", respectively, on authority of act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, 34 Stat. 1269, which provided that forest reserves shall hereafter be known as national forests.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 U.S.C. § 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/16/480.