FEDERAL · 16 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—ESTABLISHMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

Civil and criminal jurisdiction

16 U.S.C. § 480
Title16Conservation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—ESTABLISHMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

This text of 16 U.S.C. § 480 (Civil and criminal jurisdiction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
16 U.S.C. § 480.

Text

The jurisdiction, both civil and criminal, over persons within national forests shall not be affected or changed by reason of their existence, except so far as the punishment of offenses against the United States therein is concerned; the intent and meaning of this provision being that the State wherein any such national forest is situated shall not, by reason of the establishment thereof, lose its jurisdiction, nor the inhabitants thereof their rights and privileges as citizens, or be absolved from their duties as citizens of the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Carmack
329 U.S. 230 (Supreme Court, 1947)
302 case citations
United States v. County of Fresno
429 U.S. 452 (Supreme Court, 1977)
186 case citations
United States v. Fields
516 F.3d 923 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
71 case citations
United States v. State of California
655 F.2d 914 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
69 case citations
Wilson v. Cook
327 U.S. 474 (Supreme Court, 1946)
68 case citations
UTE Indian Tribe v. Utah
773 F.2d 1087 (Tenth Circuit, 1985)
38 case citations
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah
521 F. Supp. 1072 (D. Utah, 1981)
35 case citations
United States v. Gabrion
648 F.3d 307 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
30 case citations
United States v. Tommy A. Srnsky David M. Srnsky
271 F.3d 595 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
13 case citations
Stupak-Thrall v. United States
70 F.3d 881 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
12 case citations
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Thompson
811 F. Supp. 635 (D. Utah, 1993)
12 case citations
Hackford v. State of Utah
845 F.3d 1325 (Tenth Circuit, 2017)
10 case citations
United States v. Rainbow Family
695 F. Supp. 314 (E.D. Texas, 1988)
9 case citations
Koren v. Martin Marietta Services, Inc.
997 F. Supp. 196 (D. Puerto Rico, 1998)
7 case citations
Georgia Pacific Corporation v. County of Mendocino
357 F. Supp. 380 (N.D. California, 1973)
7 case citations
Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Thomas
932 F. Supp. 368 (District of Columbia, 1996)
6 case citations
State v. Quick
806 P.2d 907 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1991)
5 case citations
Jimenez v. Fourth Judicial District Attorney's Office
663 F. App'x 584 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
3 case citations
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Farrell Wayne Cross
497 S.W.3d 271 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 4, 1897, ch. 2, §1, 30 Stat. 36; Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, §12, 36 Stat. 963.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Codification
Provisions substantially in the language of this section are contained in section 12 of act Mar. 1, 1911, applicable to national forest lands acquired on the recommendation of the National Forest Reservation Commission under sections 500, 515 to 519, 521, 552 and 563 of this title.
"National forests" and "national forest" substituted in text for "forest reservations" and "reservation", respectively, on authority of act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, 34 Stat. 1269, which provided that forest reserves shall hereafter be known as national forests.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 U.S.C. § 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/16/480.