United States v. Vargas

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Vargas

73 M.J. 442, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 807

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces

DecidedJuly 8, 2014

DocketNo. 14-6009/MC

StatusPublished

This text of 73 M.J. 442 (United States v. Vargas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Vargas, 73 M.J. 442, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 807 (Ark. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

CCA 201300426. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT. OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY INTERPRETED ARTICLE 62, UCMJ, TO ALLOW A GOVERNMENT APPEAL OF THE MILITARY JUDGE’S DENIAL OF A CONTINUANCE REQUEST AS WELL AS THE MILITARY JUDGE’S ORDER RESTING THE GOVERNMENT’S CASE.

In accordance with Rule 19(a)(7)(A), Rules of Practice and Procedure, no further pleadings will be filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 201300426. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT. OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY INTERPRETED ARTICLE 62, UCMJ, TO ALLOW A GOVERNMENT APPEAL OF THE MILITARY JUDGE’S DENIAL OF A CONTINUANCE REQUEST AS WELL AS THE MILITARY JUDGE’S ORDER RESTING THE GOVERNMENT’S CASE.

In accordance with Rule 19(a)(7)(A), Rules of Practice and Procedure, no further pleadings will be filed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 M.J. 442, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vargas-armfor-2014.