FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE

Art. 51. Voting and rulings

10 U.S.C. § 851
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VII—TRIAL PROCEDURE

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 851 (Art. 51. Voting and rulings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 851.

Text

(a)Voting by members of a general or special court-martial on the findings and on the sentence shall be by secret written ballot. The junior member of the court shall count the votes. The count shall be checked by the president, who shall forthwith announce the result of the ballot to the members of the court.
(b)The military judge shall rule upon all questions of law and all interlocutory questions arising during the proceedings. Any such ruling made by the military judge upon any question of law or any interlocutory question other than the factual issue of mental responsibility of the accused is final and constitutes the ruling of the court, except that the military judge may change a ruling at any time during trial.
(c)Before a vote is taken on the findings, the military judge shall,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rinehart
8 C.M.A. 402 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
91 case citations
United States v. Jones
7 C.M.A. 623 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
70 case citations
United States v. Behenna
71 M.J. 228 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
63 case citations
United States v. Vara
8 C.M.A. 651 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
49 case citations
United States v. Williams
8 C.M.A. 325 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
43 case citations
United States v. Czekala
42 M.J. 168 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1995)
32 case citations
United States v. Cruz
10 C.M.A. 458 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
31 case citations
United States v. Cuen
9 C.M.A. 332 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
31 case citations
United States v. Brown
10 C.M.A. 498 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
31 case citations
United States v. Tavolilla
17 C.M.A. 395 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1968)
28 case citations
United States v. Moore
12 C.M.A. 696 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1962)
27 case citations
United States v. Lyon
15 C.M.A. 307 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1965)
26 case citations
United States v. Waldron
15 C.M.A. 628 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1966)
25 case citations
United States v. Henderson
11 C.M.A. 556 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1960)
23 case citations
United States v. Gordon
14 C.M.A. 314 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1963)
23 case citations
United States v. Ivory
9 C.M.A. 516 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
21 case citations
United States v. Simpson
10 C.M.A. 543 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
21 case citations
United States v. Forwerck
12 C.M.A. 540 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1961)
20 case citations
United States v. Straub
12 C.M.A. 156 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1961)
19 case citations
United States v. Crawford
12 C.M.A. 203 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1961)
18 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 54; Pub. L. 90–632, §2(21), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1340; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LVII, §5234, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2915.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a), the words "in each case" are omitted as surplusage.
In subsection (b), the word "is" is substituted for the words "shall be" in the second sentence. The word "constitutes" is substituted for the words "shall constitute". The word "However," is substituted for the word "but". The word "his" is substituted for the words "any such". The words "the ruling is" are substituted for the words "such ruling be". The words "voice vote" are substituted for the words "vote * * * viva voce".
In subsection (c), the word "must" is substituted for the word "shall" in clause (2), since a condition is prescribed, not a command. The words "United States" are substituted for the word "Government".

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2016—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–328, §5234(1), struck out ", and by members of a court-martial without a military judge upon questions of challenge," after "on the sentence".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–328, §5234(2), struck out "and, except for questions of challenge, the president of a court-martial without a military judge" after "The military judge" and substituted "is final and constitutes the ruling of the court, except that the military judge may change a ruling at any time during trial." for ", or by the president of a court-martial without a military judge upon any question of law other than a motion for a finding of not guilty, is final and constitutes the ruling of the court. However, the military judge or the president of a court-martial without a military judge may change his ruling at any time during trial. Unless the ruling is final, if any member objects thereto, the court shall be cleared and closed and the question decided by a voice vote as provided in section 852 of this title (article 52), beginning with the junior in rank."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328, §5234(3), struck out "or the president of a court-martial without a military judge" after "the military judge" in introductory provisions.
1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–632, §2(21)(A), limited the balloting on the question of challenges to courts-martial without military judges.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–632, §2(21)(B), substituted "military judge" for "law officer" and inserted reference to the military judge's ruling upon challenges for cause when a military judge is part of a court-martial and reference to questions of law.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 90–632, §2(21)(C), substituted "military judge" for "law officer" and made minor changes in phraseology eliminating the division between general and special court-martials.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 90–632, §2(21)(D), added subsec. (d).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/851.