United States v. Parker
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6856
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
HAYWARD WILLIAM PARKER, JR.,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (2:90-cr-00064-JAB-2)
Submitted: January 11, 2010 Decided: February 2, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Norman Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Hayward William Parker, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his “Motion for Modification of Sentence”
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Parker’s motion for transcripts at government expense and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Parker, No. 2:90-cr-00064-JAB-2 (M.D.N.C. May 1, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Parker (United States v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.