United States v. Parker
This text of United States v. Parker (United States v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8463
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEMOND O’NEIL PARKER, a/k/a Neil,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-nkm-9)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 4, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demond O’Neil Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Demond O’Neil Parker appeals the district court’s
order granting his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Parker’s motions to:
vacate the district court’s order, appoint counsel, and remand
the case, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Parker, No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-9 (W.D.
Va. Oct. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Parker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-parker-ca4-2009.